From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-rdma: move admin queue cleanup to nvme_rdma_free_ctrl
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:55:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <012601d1e104$5cde3400$169a9c00$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578B1F3B.3020100@grimberg.me>
> > Hey Sagi, here is some lite reading for you. :)
> >
> > Prelude: As part of disconnecting an iwarp connection, the iwarp provider
needs
> > to post an IW_CM_EVENT_CLOSE event to iw_cm, which is scheduled onto the
> > singlethread workq thread for iw_cm.
> >
> > Here is what happens with Sagi's patch:
> >
> > nvme_rdma_device_unplug() calls nvme_rdma_stop_queue() which calls
> > rdma_disconnect(). This triggers the disconnect. iw_cxgb4 posts the
> > IW_CM_EVENT_CLOSE to iw_cm, which ends up calling cm_close_handler() in the
> > iw_cm workq thread context. cm_close_handler() calls the rdma_cm event
> handler
> > for this cm_id, function cm_iw_handler(), which blocks until any currently
> > running event handler for this cm_id finishes. It does this by calling
> > cm_disable_callback(). However since this whole unplug process is running
in
> > the event handler function for this same cm_id, the iw_cm workq thread is
now
> > stuck in a deadlock. nvme_rdma_device_unplug() however, continues on and
> > schedules the controller delete worker thread and waits for it to complete.
The
> > delete controller worker thread tries to disconnect and destroy all the
> > remaining IO queues, but gets stuck in the destroy() path on the first IO
queue
> > because the iw_cm workq thread is already stuck, and processing the CLOSE
> event
> > is required to release a reference the iw_cm has on the iwarp providers qp.
So
> > everything comes to a grinding halt....
> >
> > Now: Ming's 2 patches avoid this deadlock because the cm_id that received
the
> > device removal event is disconnected/destroyed _only after_ all the
controller
> > queues are disconnected/destroyed. So nvme_rdma_device_unplug() doesn't get
> > stuck waiting for the controller to delete the io queues, and only after
that
> > completes, does it delete the cm_id/qp that got the device removal event.
It
> > then returns thus causing the rdma_cm to release the cm_id's callback mutex.
> > This causes the iw_cm workq thread to now unblock and we continue on. (can
> you
> > say house of cards?)
> >
> > So the net is: the cm_id that received the device remove event _must_ be
> > disconnect/destroyed _last_.
>
> Hey Steve, thanks for the detailed description.
>
> IMHO, this really looks like a buggy design in iWARP connection
> management implementation. The fact that a rdma_disconnect forward
> progress is dependent on other cm_id execution looks wrong and
> backwards to me.
>
Yea. I'm not sure how to fix it at this point...
> Given that the device is being removed altogether I don't think that
> calling rdma_disconnect is important at all. Given the fact that
> ib_drain_qp makes sure that the queue-pair is in error state does
> this incremental patch resolve the iwarp-deadlock you are seeing?
>
I'll need to change c4iw_drain_sq/rq() to move the QP to ERROR explicitly. When
I implemented them I assumed the QP would be disconnected. Let me try this and
report back.
> --
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index fd90b5c00aae..e7eec7d8c705 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> @@ -1342,8 +1342,12 @@ static int nvme_rdma_device_unplug(struct
> nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
> goto queue_delete;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * iwcm does not handle rdma_disconnect within DEVICE_REMOVAL
> + * event very well, so we settle with qp drain
> + */
> + ib_drain_qp(queue->qp);
> /* Free this queue ourselves */
> - nvme_rdma_stop_queue(queue);
> nvme_rdma_destroy_queue_ib(queue);
>
> /* Return non-zero so the cm_id will destroy implicitly */
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 21:26 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-rdma: device removal crash fixes Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-rdma: grab reference for device removal event Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:33 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-rdma: move admin queue cleanup to nvme_rdma_free_ctrl Ming Lin
2016-07-13 21:33 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 23:19 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-13 23:36 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-13 23:59 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-14 6:39 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-14 17:09 ` J Freyensee
2016-07-14 18:04 ` Ming Lin
2016-07-14 9:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 9:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 14:30 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 14:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-14 14:59 ` Steve Wise
[not found] ` <011301d1dde0$4450e4e0$ccf2aea0$@opengridcomputing.com>
2016-07-14 15:02 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 15:26 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-14 21:27 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-15 15:52 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-17 6:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-18 14:55 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2016-07-18 15:47 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-18 16:34 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-18 18:04 ` Steve Wise
2016-07-13 21:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] nvme-rdma: device removal crash fixes Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='012601d1e104$5cde3400$169a9c00$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).