From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix request completion holes
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:53:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <026401d353fb$24d56d60$6e804820$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171102163614.GK18874@ziepe.ca>
>
> > iWARP spec too. This is in regard to completion ordering though. The
local
> > invalidate send WR must have the IB_SEND_FENCE flag set if you want it to
only
> > be executed after all prior send WRs are executed.
>
> Oh right, yes, you need to have local invalidate fence to guarentee
> that, but usually a local operation will not refer to a RKEY, so
> execution ordering wont matter.
>
> But this is a good general point, doesn't a ULP need to set FENCE on
> SEND, eg:
>
> RDMA READ (rkey)
> RDMA READ (rkey)
> SEND w/ FENCE (tell remote to invalidate rkey)
>
> Otherwise IBA Table 79 says RDMA READ can pass SEND and we have a
> situation where the rkey has become invalidated when the remote is
> still trying to use it.
>
> IBA actually explicitly calls this out (pg 538):
>
> RDMA Read operations may be executed at the target after subse-
> quent Send and Invalidate operation already performed the invalida-
> tion at the target. That may cause the RDMA Read operation to fail.
> Setting the Fence Indicator on the subsequent operations guarantees
> that the RDMA Read will fully complete before the invalidation takes
> place.
>
> None of our ULPs use IB_SEND_FENCE - so this is a bug!
>
I think the nvmf target doesn't post the SEND_W_INVALIDATE (NVMF CQE) until the
RDMA READ(s) (and back end BIO submission) complete.
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 8:55 [PATCH 0/3] Fix request completion holes Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-31 8:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-rdma: don't suppress send completions Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-31 8:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-rdma: don't complete requests before a send work request has completed Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-31 8:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-rdma: wait for local invalidation before completing a request Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-31 9:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix request completion holes Max Gurtovoy
2017-10-31 11:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-01 16:02 ` idanb
2017-11-01 16:09 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-11-01 16:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-01 17:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-01 17:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-02 8:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-02 15:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-02 15:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-02 15:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-02 16:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-02 16:18 ` Steve Wise
2017-11-02 16:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-02 16:53 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2017-11-02 16:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-01 17:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-01 22:23 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-11-02 17:55 ` Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='026401d353fb$24d56d60$6e804820$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).