Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] nvme: generate uevent once a multipath namespace is operational again
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:49:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <053d4cda-e0dc-8384-faf4-007b17425c5b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518070544.GA8521@lst.de>

On 5/18/21 9:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:59:09AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> I asked this on v1, is this only needed for mpath devices?
>>
>> Yes; we need to send the KOBJ_CHANGE event on the mpath device as it's not
>> backed by hardware. The only non-multipathed devices I've seen so far are
>> PCI devices where events are generated by the PCI device itself.
> 
> Which really goes back to my repeated request to add a comment to the
> code to document why we need this uevent.  It surely looks out of place
> and it seems Hannes can tell a story of why it is required.  I'd really
> like to see that story next to the call.
> 
The issue here is that MD RAID will detect an I/O failure once the last 
path drops and fail the namespace, but will continue to work in degraded 
mode.
But upon reconnect the namespace will stay failed, and MD RAID will 
continue to operate in degraded mode even though the path it available 
again.
And without this patch there is no programmatic way on how MD RAID could 
re-assemble the degraded array as there is no indicator that the 
namespace is usable again.

Is this the information you are looking for?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17  8:32 [PATCHv3] nvme: generate uevent once a multipath namespace is operational again Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-17 17:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-05-18  6:59   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-18  7:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  7:49       ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2021-05-18 18:00     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-05-18 18:09       ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-18 18:39         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-05-18 18:49           ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-18 19:04             ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=053d4cda-e0dc-8384-faf4-007b17425c5b@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox