From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Victor Gladkov <Victor.Gladkov@kioxia.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
"Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] nvme-fabrics: reject I/O to offline device
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:09:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07622131-6dba-3735-fa5e-528bdaef7f73@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21948197-ac36-f757-5c1f-f36f2d6d9242@grimberg.me>
On 11/17/20 9:39 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>>>> @@ -151,12 +151,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_try_sched_reset);
>>>> static void nvme_failfast_work(struct work_struct *work) {
>>>> struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>>>> struct nvme_ctrl, failfast_work);
>>>> + struct nvme_ns *ns;
>>>>
>>>> - if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING)
>>>> - return;
>>>> -
>>>> -
>>>> - set_bit(NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ctrl->flags);
>>>> + down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list) {
>>>> + if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_LIVE ||
>>>> + (ns->ana_state != NVME_ANA_OPTIMIZED &&
>>>> + ns->ana_state != NVME_ANA_NONOPTIMIZED))
>>>> + set_bit(NVME_NS_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ns->flags);
>>>> + }
>>>> + up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
>>>> dev_info(ctrl->device, "failfast expired\n");
>>>>
>>>> ...and we could leave the failfast worker running even after the
>>>> controller
>>>> transitioned to LIVE.
>>>> Cf the attached patch for details.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Hannes
>>>> --
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what makes sense to move the FAILFAST_EXPIRED bit into
>>> the namespace,
>>> Because the failfast mechanism characterizes the controller as a whole.
>>>
>> Oh, yes, I'm aware of that. But the problem here is with multipath;
>> how do we handle the situation where all controllers have the
>> 'failfast_expired' bit set?
>> Should I/O be terminated (which I think it should, given that failfast
>> is supposed to terminate the I/O)?
>> Or should I/O continue to run (as it does with your original patch)?
>
> I do agree that fast_io_fail_tmo _is_ a controller attribute and should
> remain as such.
>
> I do see what is your point Hannes, however I also think it's
> problematic that the host may fail arbitrary I/O if the controller
> happens to enter ANA inaccessible state (or have state transition
> timeout) for a period that happens to be longer than what the user
> happen to set (without communicating any of this to the controller).
>
> IFF we want to address this (I'm still not sure), we probably want
> to activate failfast timeout in ANA state transition (and clear it
> when we exit it). Then we can modify nvme_available_path() to take
> NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED into account.
>
> Anyways, I think that this can be an incremental patch because it
> doesn't change the behavior today with respect to ANA states (or
> transition between them) e.g. queue the outstanding I/O.
>
Okay then.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 15:27 [PATCH v9] nvme-fabrics: reject I/O to offline device Victor Gladkov
2020-09-29 18:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-09-30 5:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-09-30 6:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-01 8:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-15 15:45 ` Victor Gladkov
2020-11-16 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-17 8:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-20 13:09 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
[not found] <3e9337bfbd7f410eb632e96a44b43924@kioxia.com>
2020-09-30 13:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07622131-6dba-3735-fa5e-528bdaef7f73@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=Victor.Gladkov@kioxia.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox