From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4540C54E58 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:18:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:Subject:From:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=e4mBNhNJAfzCLIgLNL/TVEW4LEiyH9RiGFcR6yq7AKo=; b=R1ByOsOqXfW5g4wL4BtjMDK5Af KmhBlrCI1CmV3EOYFHocGbIlNs5R3Oz1AbBfvX1u/L/lx9mv6tT5d3HpW2R5/A8w8uwFTio4qfxu1 XUNz9Cka2HQpk8PCsjVcPC2mgzPRl1Q0JovnTgQpzUmwYycQjccqwLCI7h9NtuGpU6j5KdFgkdZ/B KRGs7Gf14jyMmKejq4fSxVGcKfla1gNEU2fv/fQCjAW0pGNk/DRn+ZIDjjeh+b1M1KdYu38GlVy0T 2vYqwTv0oeta6DRUAt9REkro/9G0haVsFL3uavgRksQkwoTy+TemEfnXjDi8SzLH0z1gcpeemaRpz 35aV5Gmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rmmTP-0000000FDNy-1iQx; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:18:39 +0000 Received: from mail-m49216.qiye.163.com ([45.254.49.216]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rmmTL-0000000FDKI-1TvZ for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:18:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.182.216] (unknown [110.185.170.227]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id CBBFB4C01BA; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:17:56 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <08b936ff-10d0-48d8-aacd-6ae1e2659600@easystack.cn> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:17:56 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Jirong Feng Subject: Re: Should NVME_SC_INVALID_NS be translated to BLK_STS_IOERR instead of BLK_STS_NOTSUPP so that multipath(both native and dm) can failover on the failure? To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, peng.xiao@easystack.cn, Christoph Hellwig References: <89b542d3-dedb-4d5c-ad7a-279467d28e51@easystack.cn> <53b68337-8370-4deb-9a90-bf5dbb7d6d33@grimberg.me> <6b345b99-3dd3-4c96-8644-e9b40d387b58@easystack.cn> <20240131062526.GA16177@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20240131062526.GA16177@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFJQjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkaSB5KVh0fGh5PHR8fGUxISVUZERMWGhIXJBQOD1 lXWRgSC1lBWUpKS1VKQ05VSkxLVUlJTFlXWRYaDxIVHRRZQVlPS0hVSkpLSEpDVUpLS1VLWQY+ X-HM-Tid: 0a8e59dd9296022ekunmcbbfb4c01ba X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6NQg6Ogw6PTc0GlY8HykeOD4e TzUKCw1VSlVKTEpLQktPTUxMSE5IVTMWGhIXVRESCRQVHFUdHhUcOx4aCAIIDxoYEFUYFUVZV1kS C1lBWUpKS1VKQ05VSkxLVUlJTFlXWQgBWUFJT05INwY+ X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240319_201835_659804_C889B227 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 3.74 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org hi, just kindly ask, how about the previous patch? will it be merged?