public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>, "Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
	"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	"Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 19:42:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fa95ea2-4539-472b-adae-300e46a78f20@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218-dma_prep_config-v2-6-c07079836128@nxp.com>

On 12/19/25 00:56, Frank Li wrote:
> Use the new dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API to combine the
> configuration and descriptor preparation into a single call.
> 
> Since dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() performs the configuration and
> preparation atomically and dw edma driver implement prep_config_sg() call
> back, so dmaengine_prep_config_single() is reentriable, the mutex can be
> removed.

What about for platforms other than DesignWare EDMA ?
This is a generic endpoint driver that can work on any platform that is endpoint
capable and that has a DMA channel for the PCI endpoint.

The dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API should be handling everything
transparently for any platform, regardless of the DMA channel driver
implementing or not the prep_config_sg() callback.

For platforms that do not implement it, I suspect that the mutex will still be
needed here. So how to we resolve this ? Ideally, all of that should be hidden
by the DMA API. The endpoint driver should not need to deal with these differences.

> 
> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> index 56b1c6a7706a9e2dd9d8aaf17b440129b948486c..8b5ea5d4c79dfd461b767cfd4033a9e4604c94b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> @@ -388,22 +388,15 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(lock);
> -
>  	dma_dev = dmaengine_get_dma_device(chan);
>  	dma_addr = dma_map_single(dma_dev, seg->buf, seg->length, dir);
>  	ret = dma_mapping_error(dma_dev, dma_addr);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto unlock;
> -
> -	ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &sconf);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Failed to configure DMA channel\n");
> -		goto unmap;
> -	}
> +		return ret;
>  
> -	desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, dma_addr, seg->length,
> -					   sconf.direction, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> +	desc = dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe(chan, dma_addr, seg->length,
> +						 sconf.direction,
> +						 DMA_CTRL_ACK, &sconf);
>  	if (!desc) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare DMA\n");
>  		ret = -EIO;
> @@ -426,9 +419,6 @@ static int nvmet_pci_epf_dma_transfer(struct nvmet_pci_epf *nvme_epf,
>  unmap:
>  	dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, dma_addr, seg->length, dir);
>  
> -unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(lock);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18 15:56 [PATCH v2 0/8] dmaengine: Add new API to combine onfiguration and descriptor preparation Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:33   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-23 10:41   ` Vinod Koul
2026-03-09 11:04   ` Vinod Koul
2026-03-09 14:42     ` Frank Li
2026-03-17 10:37       ` Vinod Koul
2026-03-17 14:04         ` Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:34   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:35   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank Li
2025-12-19 10:42   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank Li
2025-12-18 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() API Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0fa95ea2-4539-472b-adae-300e46a78f20@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox