From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
axboe@kernel.dk, mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: check duplicate unique identifiers in order
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:01:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352e125-180b-4ec9-ac3e-1cd8570910a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFrBVeEcapNtOvPx@kbusch-mbp>
On 6/24/25 11:16 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:12:29AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:18:58AM -0400, John Meneghini wrote:
>>> On 5/9/25 11:33 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>
>>>> If those are not unique, they need to be blanked out to make sure we don't
>>>> expose these on the namespace's sysfs attributes.
>>>
>>> OK, we can add another patch that blanks out the lower precedent/invalid IDs.
>>>
>>> Will that work?
>>
>> I think you'd have to blank out the non-unique ones, otherwise the
>> driver would export them.
>>
>> And while I think that might work, this proposal didn't go over so well
>> last time it came up:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20250414111916.GB13225@lst.de/
>
> I've recently encountered some devices with this behavior, from machines
> hosted by various cloud providers. I had to pull in something
> out-of-tree like the patch here just to get things going. I think we
> should have the kernel discard lower priority fields.
OK good I will ask Bryan to resubmit this as a version 2 patch.
We can add another patch that blanks out the lower precedent/invalid IDs in sysfs so that only the unique IDs are reported.
/John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 15:16 [PATCH 1/2] nvme: check duplicate unique identifiers in order Bryan Gurney
2025-05-09 15:33 ` Keith Busch
2025-05-12 15:18 ` John Meneghini
2025-05-12 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-24 15:16 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-15 19:01 ` John Meneghini [this message]
2025-07-15 19:29 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-22 7:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-22 11:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-09-12 20:32 ` John Meneghini
2025-09-16 19:04 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352e125-180b-4ec9-ac3e-1cd8570910a3@redhat.com \
--to=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox