From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com (J Freyensee)
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] nvme: split a new struct nvme_ctrl out of struct nvme_dev
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:23:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445462626.3307.64.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444975128-8768-7-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, 2015-10-16@07:58 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The new struct nvme_ctrl will be used by the common NVMe code that
> sits
> on top of struct request_queue and the new nvme_ctrl_ops abstraction.
> It only contains the bare minimum required, which consists of values
> sampled during controller probe, the admin queue pointer and a second
> struct device pointer at the moment, but more will follow later.
> Only
> values that are not used in the I/O fast path should be moved to
> struct nvme_ctrl so that drivers can optimize their cache line usage
> easily. That's also the reason why we have two device pointers as
> the struct device is used for DMA mapping purposes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 10 +--
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 61 ++++++---------
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> ----------
> drivers/nvme/host/scsi.c | 85 ++++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
>
<snipped>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index 370aa5b..3e409fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -25,46 +25,16 @@ extern unsigned char nvme_io_timeout;
> extern unsigned char admin_timeout;
> #define ADMIN_TIMEOUT (admin_timeout * HZ)
>
> -/*
> - * Represents an NVM Express device. Each nvme_dev is a PCI
> function.
> - */
> -struct nvme_dev {
> - struct list_head node;
> - struct nvme_queue **queues;
> +struct nvme_ctrl {
Whether it is a PCIe NVMe device with multiple controllers or something
beyond PCIe, I think an instance of struct nvme_ctrl is going to need
to know its cntlid. How does this struct know its cntlid? I'm not
initially seeing it. I think it would make more sense to have struct
nvme_ctrl have a member that stores its cntlid value. It would
basically be the "name" of the specific nvme_ctrl instance allocated.
> + const struct nvme_ctrl_ops *ops;
> struct request_queue *admin_q;
> - struct blk_mq_tag_set tagset;
> - struct blk_mq_tag_set admin_tagset;
> - u32 __iomem *dbs;
> struct device *dev;
> - struct dma_pool *prp_page_pool;
> - struct dma_pool *prp_small_pool;
> int instance;
> - unsigned queue_count;
> - unsigned online_queues;
> - unsigned max_qid;
> - int q_depth;
> - u32 db_stride;
> - u32 ctrl_config;
> - struct msix_entry *entry;
> - void __iomem *bar;
> - struct list_head namespaces;
> - struct kref kref;
> - struct device *device;
> - struct work_struct reset_work;
> - struct work_struct probe_work;
> - struct work_struct scan_work;
> +
> char name[12];
> char serial[20];
> char model[40];
> char firmware_rev[8];
> - bool subsystem;
Also, this is something probably a bit more far visioned, but I think
struct nvme_ctrl would need a mechanism to know what NVMe subsystem it
sits in. Even if 'subsystem' stayed in the struct, I'm not sure how a
bool would work for this.
> - u32 max_hw_sectors;
> - u32 stripe_size;
> - u32 page_size;
> - void __iomem *cmb;
> - dma_addr_t cmb_dma_addr;
> - u64 cmb_size;
> - u32 cmbsz;
> u16 oncs;
> u16 abort_limit;
> u8 event_limit;
> @@ -78,7 +48,7 @@ struct nvme_dev {
> struct nvme_ns {
> struct list_head list;
>
> - struct nvme_dev *dev;
> + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl;
This seems a bit backwards to me. It's the controller (cntlid) that is
going to tell the host how many namespaces are associated with it via
the NVMe Identify commands. Thus, I would have thought that a list of
struct nvme_ns instances would be in a struct nvme_ctrl definition, not
vice-versa. Unless '*ctrl' is going to be used as a back pointer? But
then in 'struct nvme_ctrl' I didn't see initially see anything that
associates itself to the namespaces attached to it.
> struct request_queue *queue;
> struct gendisk *disk;
> struct kref kref;
> @@ -92,6 +62,19 @@ struct nvme_ns {
> u32 mode_select_block_len;
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-21 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-16 5:58 nvme driver split V2 Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] nvme: add missing unmaps in nvme_queue_rq Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-20 14:07 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] nvme: move struct nvme_iod to pci.c Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] nvme: split command submission helpers out of pci.c Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-21 18:48 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] nvme: add a vendor field to struct nvme_dev Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-21 18:58 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-21 19:10 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] nvme: use offset instead of a struct for registers Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 17:30 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-21 20:28 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] nvme: split a new struct nvme_ctrl out of struct nvme_dev Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-20 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-20 11:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 14:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-21 21:23 ` J Freyensee [this message]
2015-10-21 22:51 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 0:15 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-22 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] nvme: simplify nvme_setup_prps calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] nvme: refactor nvme_queue_rq Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] nvme: move nvme_error_status to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 10:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] nvme: move nvme_setup_flush and nvme_setup_rw " Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-20 11:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-21 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 14:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] nvme: split __nvme_submit_sync_cmd Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] nvme: use the block layer for userspace passthrough metadata Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 20:04 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-18 18:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] nvme: move block_device_operations and ns/ctrl freeing to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 14/18] nvme: add explicit quirk handling Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] nvme: add a common helper to read Identify Controller data Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 22:44 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-22 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 16/18] nvme: move the call to nvme_init_identify earlier Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 17/18] nvme: move namespace scanning to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 6:14 ` Ming Lin
2015-10-16 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 23:27 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-22 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 13:48 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 21:24 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-23 5:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 5:58 ` [PATCH 18/18] nvme: move chardev and sysfs interface " Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 0:11 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-22 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 18:36 ` J Freyensee
2015-10-22 18:59 ` Jon Derrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445462626.3307.64.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).