From: mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)
Subject: [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:53:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447739639.8017.8.camel@hasee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447662575.23230.105.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
On Mon, 2015-11-16@00:29 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-16@00:08 -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-15@23:30 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-11-07@18:00 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > This series continues the NVMe host drive split and also starts adding a
> > > > consume for it. The consumer is mostly interesting for developers at this
> > > > point as it's simply a 'loopback' NVMe device that ties the split NVMe
> > > > driver fronted into the new generic NVMe target subsystem.
> > >
> > > Very excited to see this code posted. 8-)
> > >
> > > > This was developed for our NVMe over Fabrics prototype, but will also be useful for
> > > > other work like Ming's virtio-nvme or event an implementation traditional
> > > > PCIe NVMe using vhost.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Wrt to vhost-nvme, the WIP code (Dr. Hannes + Dave CC'ed) I'm currently
> > > hacking on is here:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/log/?h=vhost-nvme-wip
> > >
> > > Note it's still a week or two away (using rts-megasas as a reference)
> > > from actually functioning across a modest number of queue resources, but
> > > should at least give interested folks an idea of how things look so far.
> >
> > Hi Nic,
> >
> > FYI,
> >
> > I have done the vhost-nvme patches(based on our previous discussion) on
> > top of NVMe target.
> >
> > I'll post kernel & qemu patches early this week.
> >
>
> Great. Looking forward to seeing the prototype code.
>
> > But the tests I have done so far didn't show competitive performance
> > compared with vhost-scsi. Maybe because the mmio thing is slow.
> >
>
> Anything interesting hot-spots that show up in perf output..?
To ease development, I use nested kvm.
"vm_host" runs on bare metal and "vm_guest" runs on "vm_host"
I just integrated Google's extension to vhost-nvme.
https://github.com/rlnelson-git/linux-nvme.git
It's amazing performance improves a lot.
I use a 256M /dev/ram0 on vm_host as backend.
fio 4k read:
qemu-nvme: ~20M to ~30M
qemu-vhost-nvme + google ext: 80M to 200M(not very stable though)
(BTW, still waiting for employer's approval to send out patches)
PerfTop: 1039 irqs/sec kernel:99.8% exact: 0.0% [4000Hz cpu-clock], (all, 4 CPUs)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36.93% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
20.98% [kernel] [k] vmx_handle_external_intr
10.10% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
4.95% [kernel] [k] __mutex_unlock_slowpath
4.41% [kernel] [k] lock_acquire
4.15% [kernel] [k] lock_is_held
2.30% [kernel] [k] mutex_lock_nested
1.68% [kernel] [k] lock_release
1.14% [kernel] [k] put_compound_page
0.93% [kernel] [k] debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled
0.66% [kernel] [k] check_preemption_disabled
0.64% [kernel] [k] __schedule
0.62% [kernel] [k] lock_acquired
0.54% [kernel] [k] rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online
0.54% [kernel] [k] preempt_count_sub
0.54% [kernel] [k] preempt_count_add
0.46% [kernel] [k] find_vma
0.45% [kernel] [k] vmcs_writel
0.40% [kernel] [k] ___might_sleep
0.38% [kernel] [k] rcu_note_context_switch
0.37% [kernel] [k] rcu_read_lock_sched_held
0.32% [kernel] [k] __rcu_is_watching
0.32% [kernel] [k] follow_trans_huge_pmd
0.31% [kernel] [k] debug_smp_processor_id
0.22% [kernel] [k] follow_page_mask
0.18% [kernel] [k] __get_user_pages
0.16% [kernel] [k] vmx_read_guest_seg_ar
0.16% [kernel] [k] nvmet_vhost_rw
0.15% [kernel] [k] kthread_should_stop
0.14% [kernel] [k] schedule
0.14% [kernel] [k] rcu_is_watching
0.12% [kernel] [k] nvmet_vhost_sq_thread
0.11% [kernel] [k] get_parent_ip
0.11% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 17:00 [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] nvme: move set_queue_count to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] nvme: move enable/disable/shutdown_ctrl " Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 16:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-09 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] nvme: move CC setup into nvme_enable_ctrl Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] nvme: move the timeout module paramters to common code Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] nvme: add segment limitations Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] nvme: export symbols needed for nvme-loop Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] nvmet: add a generic NVMe target Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 10:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-07 17:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] nvme-loop: add a NVMe loopback device Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-08 10:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-08 13:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-15 19:18 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-16 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-16 9:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-16 7:30 ` [RFC] generic NVMe target and NVMe loop driver Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-11-16 8:08 ` Ming Lin
2015-11-16 8:29 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-11-17 5:53 ` Ming Lin [this message]
2015-11-16 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447739639.8017.8.camel@hasee \
--to=mlin@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox