From: Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com (Bart Van Assche)
Subject: [PATCH rfc 04/10] block: Add a non-selective polling interface
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:21:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489526506.2676.13.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8124df3-bd09-2eb2-9899-3c9195605510@grimberg.me>
On Mon, 2017-03-13@10:15 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > Additionally, I think making the hardware context an argument of this function
> > instead of using blk_mq_map_queue(q, smp_processor_id()) would make this
> > function much more versatile.
>
> What do you mean? remember that the callers interface to the device is
> a request queue, it doesn't even know if its a blk-mq device. Can you
> explain in more details what you would like to see?
Have you considered to make the CPU ID an argument instead of using the
smp_processor_id() result?
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-14 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 13:16 [PATCH rfc 00/10] non selective polling block interface Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 01/10] nvme-pci: Split __nvme_process_cq to poll and handle Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:57 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-22 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 02/10] nvme-pci: Add budget to __nvme_process_cq Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-22 19:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 03/10] nvme-pci: open-code polling logic in nvme_poll Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-22 19:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 04/10] block: Add a non-selective polling interface Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-10 3:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2017-03-13 8:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 16:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-13 8:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-14 21:21 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 05/10] nvme-pci: Support blk_poll_batch Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 06/10] IB/cq: Don't force IB_POLL_DIRECT poll context for ib_process_cq_direct Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-13 8:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-14 21:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 07/10] nvme-rdma: Don't rearm the CQ when polling directly Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:52 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 08/10] nvme-rdma: Support blk_poll_batch Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 09/10] nvmet: Use non-selective polling Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-09 13:54 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-03-09 13:16 ` [PATCH rfc 10/10] target: " Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-18 23:58 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-03-21 11:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489526506.2676.13.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).