linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item
@ 2017-03-08 20:00 Sagi Grimberg
  2017-03-08 21:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-03-08 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)


We need to make sure that the cq work item does not
run when we are destroying the cq. Unlike flush_work,
cancel_work_sync protects against self-requeue of the
work item (which we can do in ib_cq_poll_work).

Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
index e95510117a6d..2746d2eb3d52 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void ib_free_cq(struct ib_cq *cq)
 		irq_poll_disable(&cq->iop);
 		break;
 	case IB_POLL_WORKQUEUE:
-		flush_work(&cq->work);
+		cancel_work_sync(&cq->work);
 		break;
 	default:
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item
  2017-03-08 20:00 [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item Sagi Grimberg
@ 2017-03-08 21:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2017-03-08 22:12 ` Bart Van Assche
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-03-08 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)


Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item
  2017-03-08 20:00 [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item Sagi Grimberg
  2017-03-08 21:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2017-03-08 22:12 ` Bart Van Assche
  2017-03-12 19:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
  2017-03-24 20:41 ` Doug Ledford
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2017-03-08 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Wed, 2017-03-08@22:00 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> We need to make sure that the cq work item does not
> run when we are destroying the cq. Unlike flush_work,
> cancel_work_sync protects against self-requeue of the
> work item (which we can do in ib_cq_poll_work).

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche at sandisk.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item
  2017-03-08 20:00 [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item Sagi Grimberg
  2017-03-08 21:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2017-03-08 22:12 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2017-03-12 19:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
  2017-03-24 20:41 ` Doug Ledford
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2017-03-12 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Wed, Mar 08, 2017@10:00:52PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> We need to make sure that the cq work item does not
> run when we are destroying the cq. Unlike flush_work,
> cancel_work_sync protects against self-requeue of the
> work item (which we can do in ib_cq_poll_work).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
> ---

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at mellanox.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20170312/b1a2a558/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item
  2017-03-08 20:00 [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item Sagi Grimberg
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-03-12 19:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
@ 2017-03-24 20:41 ` Doug Ledford
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Ledford @ 2017-03-24 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)


On Wed, 2017-03-08@22:00 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> We need to make sure that the cq work item does not
> run when we are destroying the cq. Unlike flush_work,
> cancel_work_sync protects against self-requeue of the
> work item (which we can do in ib_cq_poll_work).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>

Hi Sagi, I didn't know if this was a theoretical or you actually hit
this in practice, so I pulled it for -rc in case it was actually being
hit in the wild. ?Thanks.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford at redhat.com>
? ? GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
? ?
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B ?1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-24 20:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-08 20:00 [PATCH] IB/core: Protect against self-requeue of a cq work item Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-08 21:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-08 22:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-12 19:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-03-24 20:41 ` Doug Ledford

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).