From: Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com (Bart Van Assche)
Subject: [PATCH v2] nvme-rdma: support devices with queue size < 32
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:32:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491838338.4199.5.camel@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519881025.363156294.1491837154312.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
On Mon, 2017-04-10@17:12 +0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> In the case of small NVMe-oF queue size (<32) we may enter
> a deadlock caused by the fact that the IB completions aren't sent
> waiting for 32 and the send queue will fill up.
>
> The error is seen as (using mlx5):
> [ 2048.693355] mlx5_0:mlx5_ib_post_send:3765:(pid 7273):
> [ 2048.693360] nvme nvme1: nvme_rdma_post_send failed with error code -12
>
> This patch changes the way the signaling is done so
> that it depends on the queue depth now. The magic define has
> been removed completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <marta.rybczynska at kalray.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Jones <sjones at kalray.eu>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> * signal by queue size/2, remove hardcoded 32
> * support queue depth of 1
>
> drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index 47a479f..4de1b92 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,18 @@ static void nvme_rdma_send_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
> nvme_rdma_wr_error(cq, wc, "SEND");
> }
>
> +static inline nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
> +{
> + int sig_limit;
> +
> + /* We signal completion every queue depth/2 and also
> + * handle the case of possible device with queue_depth=1,
> + * where we would need to signal every message.
> + */
> + sig_limit = max(queue->queue_size / 2, 1);
> + return (++queue->sig_count % sig_limit) == 0;
> +}
> +
> static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
> struct nvme_rdma_qe *qe, struct ib_sge *sge, u32 num_sge,
> struct ib_send_wr *first, bool flush)
> @@ -1056,9 +1068,6 @@ static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
> * Would have been way to obvious to handle this in hardware or
> * at least the RDMA stack..
> *
> - * This messy and racy code sniplet is copy and pasted from the iSER
> - * initiator, and the magic '32' comes from there as well.
> - *
> * Always signal the flushes. The magic request used for the flush
> * sequencer is not allocated in our driver's tagset and it's
> * triggered to be freed by blk_cleanup_queue(). So we need to
> @@ -1066,7 +1075,7 @@ static int nvme_rdma_post_send(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
> * embedded in request's payload, is not freed when __ib_process_cq()
> * calls wr_cqe->done().
> */
> - if ((++queue->sig_count % 32) == 0 || flush)
> + if (nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(queue) || flush)
> wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
>
> if (first)
Hello Marta,
The approach of this patch is suboptimal from a performance point of view.
If the number of WRs that have been submitted since the last signaled WR
was submitted would be tracked in a member variable that would allow to
get rid of the (relatively slow) division operation.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 15:12 [PATCH v2] nvme-rdma: support devices with queue size < 32 Marta Rybczynska
2017-04-10 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 15:21 ` Marta Rybczynska
2017-04-10 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 15:31 ` hch
2017-04-10 15:32 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-11 8:52 ` Marta Rybczynska
2017-04-11 10:50 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-04-11 11:04 ` Marta Rybczynska
2017-04-11 15:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-20 9:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Marta Rybczynska
2017-04-20 11:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-04-20 11:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-04-21 8:01 ` Marta Rybczynska
2017-05-22 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-23 15:32 ` Marta Rybczynska
2017-06-05 9:47 ` Marta Rybczynska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491838338.4199.5.camel@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).