From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com (Bart Van Assche) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:28:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] scsi/pmcraid: Remove an unused structure member In-Reply-To: <5ea64c10-aa3e-f0ee-cfba-e93b3d8e1428@suse.de> References: <20171016224940.1332-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> <20171016224940.1332-8-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> <5ea64c10-aa3e-f0ee-cfba-e93b3d8e1428@suse.de> Message-ID: <1508250508.3596.0.camel@wdc.com> On Tue, 2017-10-17@08:21 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 10/17/2017 12:49 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche > > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn > > Cc: linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org > > Cc: Martin K. Petersen > > Cc: Anil Ravindranath > > --- > > drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h > > index 8bfac72a242b..44da91712115 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.h > > @@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ struct pmcraid_sglist { > > u32 order; > > u32 num_sg; > > u32 num_dma_sg; > > - u32 buffer_len; > > struct scatterlist scatterlist[1]; > > }; > > > > > > This actually is the same story that we've had with ipr (and, looking at > the code, those two drivers look awfully similar ...). > pmcraid_sglist looks as if it's a hardware-dependent structure, so just > removing one entry from the middle of a structure might not be a good idea. > But this is something for the pmcraid folks to clarify. Hello Hannes, Sorry but I don't see how a structure that contains a struct scatterlist could be hardware-dependent? Thanks, Bart.