From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com (Bart Van Assche)
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:45:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] crypto: scompress - use sgl_alloc() and sgl_free()
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_-pqqVn5QeuM_OR0itQS-v5uFATt-ZzNDmPy8CHSLrGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20171016224940.1332-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
 <20171016224940.1332-3-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
 <1509547836.2530.1.camel@wdc.com>
 <CAKv+Gu_-pqqVn5QeuM_OR0itQS-v5uFATt-ZzNDmPy8CHSLrGg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1509551145.2530.10.camel@wdc.com>

On Wed, 2017-11-01@15:17 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 1 November 2017@14:50, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-10-16@15:49 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > Use the sgl_alloc() and sgl_free() functions instead of open coding
> > > these functions.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche at wdc.com>
> > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au>
> > 
> > Ard and/or Herbert, can you please have a look at this patch and let us know
> > whether or not it looks fine to you?
> 
> The patch itself does not look unreasonable, but I can't find
> sgl_alloc() anywhere in the source tree. Given that you have cc'ed me
> on this patch only, I can only assume that you are adding this as part
> of the series, but without any context, I can't really review this,
> sorry.

Hello Ard,

Do you expect to be Cc-ed personally or is Cc-ing the linux-crypto mailing
list sufficient? The linux-crypto mailing list was Cc-ed for the entire patch
series as one can see here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto at vger.kernel.org/msg28485.html.

Thanks,

Bart.