From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dledford@redhat.com (Doug Ledford) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:58:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix request completion holes In-Reply-To: References: <20171108100616.26605-1-sagi@grimberg.me> <1510611044.3735.49.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1510847893.8751.0.camel@redhat.com> On Thu, 2017-11-16@17:39 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > Sagi, are you ready for me to take this series in? It seemed like there > > was a question as to whether you might want to try atomics instead of > > spin locks, or do you want to stick with spinlocks? > > I still need a review for this, and I think we'll get it in through the > nvme tree (via the block tree). Thanks. Sorry, I didn't pay that close of attention to the files patched in each one. I just saw rdma in each subject line and assumed it was an rdma destined patch series. Looking closer I see it was really just Cc:ed to linux-rdma for review. -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: