From: bvanassche@acm.org (Bart Van Assche)
Subject: bad IOPS when running multiple btest/fio in parallel
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 08:49:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539359350.249485.6.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539319463418.78556@marvell.com>
On Fri, 2018-10-12@04:44 +0000, Yao Lin wrote:
> Today I changed to a much simpler setup and the same issue persists.
>
> Directly connect 2 PCs (identical hardware) with a pair of 100G rNICs.
> Create a null block device on the target PC and configure it as the
> NVMeOF target. So, there is no switch or SSD in this setup. And this is
> a single FIO, not the 4 FIO in parallel I mentioned earlier.
>
> Start fio test against that null block device from the host, the best
> IOPS is 1550K. That's the best IOPS after I try out many different QD,
> # of job, and CPU affinity setting. Run the same fio test on the target,
> I get 2250K IOPS (it jumps to 3650K when I increased the number of
> threads).
>
> So it seems to me that Linux NVMe stack is quite good and can support
> 100Gb/s + throughput. But the same can not be said of the NVMeOF stack.
> Any tuning possible?
Many high-speed network adapters need multiple connections between
initiator and target to achieve line rate (typically 2-4 connections).
>From the NVMeOF initiator driver:
set->nr_hw_queues = nctrl->queue_count - 1;
I think the "queue_count" parameter can be configured when creating a
connection. From the drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c source file:
static const match_table_t opt_tokens = {
[ ... ]
{ NVMF_OPT_NR_IO_QUEUES, "nr_io_queues=%d" },
[ ... ]
};
Have you tried to modify the nr_io_queues parameter? Have you verified
whether the 100G NICs you are using allocate multiple MSI/X vectors and
whether each vector has been assigned to another CPU?
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 4:44 bad IOPS when running multiple btest/fio in parallel Yao Lin
2018-10-12 14:39 ` Keith Busch
2018-10-12 15:37 ` [EXT] " Yao Lin
2018-10-12 15:49 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-10-12 16:02 ` Yao Lin
2018-10-15 7:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-10 21:52 Yao Lin
2018-10-15 7:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1539359350.249485.6.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox