From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>, Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH - Do we need this?
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:48:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1548948a-3cc6-4372-8d24-7a501da8b31e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <889e1d2a-1cda-4979-8279-f2f665350376@redhat.com>
On 11/13/24 05:53, John Meneghini wrote:
> Now that RHEL-10 beta has shipped we no longer support anything but native nvme multi-pathing and I'd like to do something about the multipath module parameter:
>
> bool multipath = true;
> module_param(multipath, bool, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(multipath,
> "turn on native support for multiple controllers per subsystem");
>
> I'd like to remove this parameter from nvme_core/multipath.c. The fact is, setting nvme_core.multipath=N never worked in anything but RHEL and keeping it around only causes confusion.
>
> For that matter, I'd like to remove the CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH kconfig option altogether.
>
> Does anybody actually use this?
>
> # CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is not set
>
> Do we actually support running nvme without multipath.c ?
>
Yes I think it's supported but I don't foresee any side effect of removing
CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH except that the following blktests would require some updates:
nvme/033
nvme/034
nvme/035
nvme/036
nvme/037
nvme/039
All above tests require CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is unset. So if you're planning
to get rid off this config option then we need to update above tests.
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 0:23 CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH - Do we need this? John Meneghini
2024-11-14 16:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-15 1:40 ` Guixin Liu
2024-11-18 7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-18 15:31 ` Keith Busch
2024-11-19 10:18 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2024-11-19 14:55 ` John Meneghini
2024-11-20 10:49 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1548948a-3cc6-4372-8d24-7a501da8b31e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
--cc=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox