From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: "james.p.freyensee@intel.com" <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"ming.l@ssi.samsung.com" <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
"larrystevenwise@gmail.com" <larrystevenwise@gmail.com>,
"anthony.j.knapp@intel.com" <anthony.j.knapp@intel.com>,
"pizhenwei@bytedance.com" <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvmet: fix hang in nvmet_ns_disable()
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 00:32:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17ff8d10-d25d-3ea9-8d3d-2f07f7d7c9c0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230103100357.875854-4-ap420073@gmail.com>
On 1/3/23 02:03, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> nvme target namespace is enabled or disabled by nvmet_ns_enable() or
> nvmet_ns_disable().
> The subsys->lock is used to disallow to use namespace data while
> nvmet_ns_enable() or nvmet_ns_disable() are working.
> The ns->enabled boolean variable prevents using namespace data in wrong
> state such as uninitialized state.
>
> nvmet_ns_disable() acquires ns->lock and set ns->enabled false.
> Then, it releases ns->lock for a while to wait ns->disable_done completion.
> At this point, nvmet_ns_enable() can be worked concurrently and it calls
> percpu_ref_init().
> So, ns->disable_done will never be completed.
> Therefore hang would occur at this point.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> nvmet_ns_disable();
> mutex_lock(&subsys->lock); nvmet_ns_enable();
> mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
> ns->enabled = false;
> mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
> percpu_ref_init();
> wait_for_completion(&ns->disable_done); <-- infinite wait
>
> mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
> mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
>
> INFO: task bash:926 blocked for more than 30 seconds.
> Tainted: G W 6.1.0+ #17
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> task:bash state:D stack:27200 pid:926 ppid:911
> flags:0x00004000
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __schedule+0xafc/0x2930
> ? io_schedule_timeout+0x160/0x160
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
> ? __wait_for_common+0x39b/0x5c0
> ? usleep_range_state+0x190/0x190
> schedule+0x130/0x230
> schedule_timeout+0x18a/0x240
> ? usleep_range_state+0x190/0x190
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x80
> ? lock_downgrade+0x700/0x700
> ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0xb5/0x180
> ? lock_contended+0xdf0/0xdf0
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
> ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x3c/0x190
> __wait_for_common+0x1ca/0x5c0
> ? usleep_range_state+0x190/0x190
> ? bit_wait_io+0xf0/0xf0
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x59/0x70
> nvmet_ns_disable+0x288/0x490
> ? nvmet_ns_enable+0x970/0x970
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x410/0x410
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x80
> ? configfs_write_iter+0x1df/0x480
> ? nvmet_ns_revalidate_size_store+0x220/0x220
> nvmet_ns_enable_store+0x85/0xe0
> [ ... ]
>
> Fixes: a07b4970f464 ("nvmet: add a generic NVMe target")
> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> index 89bedfcd974c..e609787577c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@
> #define IPO_IATTR_CONNECT_SQE(x) \
> (cpu_to_le32(offsetof(struct nvmf_connect_command, x)))
>
> +enum nvmet_ns_state {
> + NVMET_NS_ENABLED,
> + NVMET_NS_DISABLING,
> + NVMET_NS_DISABLED
> +};
> +
The patch looks good to me, but I'm wondering if there is a way
we can do this without adding new enable disable states ?
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-03 10:03 [PATCH 0/4] nvme: fix several bugs in nvme-fabric Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: fix delete uninitialized controller Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 0:24 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-01-04 2:42 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: fix reset " Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmet: fix hang in nvmet_ns_disable() Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 0:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2023-01-04 8:56 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvmet-tcp: fix memory leak in nvmet_tcp_free_cmd_data_in_buffers() Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 8:44 ` Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17ff8d10-d25d-3ea9-8d3d-2f07f7d7c9c0@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=anthony.j.knapp@intel.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.p.freyensee@intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=larrystevenwise@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
--cc=pizhenwei@bytedance.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox