From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: "Meneghini, John" <John.Meneghini@netapp.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Translate more status codes to blk_status_t
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:02:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18f741dd-2445-141e-ea2b-4185476da8d2@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C041F01A-6577-4DC4-A992-6F040EC6C0C9@netapp.com>
> Let me test this out and I’ll see what happens.
>
> Keith, I've tested this out, using CRD with both NVME_SC_CMD_INTERRUPTED and NVME_SC_NS_NOT_READY.
>
> It works well enough, but I think the problem goes a little deeper than this.
>
>> These are not generic IO errors and should use a non-path
>> specific error so that it can use the non-failover retry path.
>
> Yes, agreed. But we have this problem with every/any other NVMe status that gets returned as well.
> It doesn't make sense to just keep overloading the half a dozen errors you have in blk_path_error();
>
> I think the real problem is here:
>
> 276 if (unlikely(status != BLK_STS_OK && nvme_req_needs_retry(req))) {
> 277 if ((req->cmd_flags & REQ_NVME_MPATH) &&
> 278 blk_path_error(status)) {
> 279 nvme_failover_req(req);
> 280 return;
> 281 }
> "nvme/drivers/nvme/host/core.c" line 281 of 4267 --6%-- col 3-17
>
> If we are really not allowed to change the blk_path_error() routine because it's a part of
> the block layer, then why do we have it stuck in the middle of our multipathing policy
> logic?
>
> Maybe we should create an nvme_path_error() function to replace the blk_path_error()
> function here.
>
> The other problem is: setting REQ_NVME_MPATH completely changes the error
> error handling logic. If my controller has a single path it happily returns all kinds
> of NVMe errors not handled by the nvme_error_status() white list. Those
> errors all fall through your retry logic and end up returning BLK_STS_IOERR.
>
> However, as soon as we add another path to that same controller, and turn on
> REQ_NVME_MPATH, all of a sudden the controller gets a reset for returning
> the very same errors that it retuned before.
I agree we should lose this controller reset and only do this for
specific error cases where its needed (not thinking of any from the
top of my head).
> And that happens before even a single retry is attempted - unless it's an NVMe pathing error.
>
> 105 default:
> 106 /*
> 107 * Reset the controller for any non-ANA error as we don't know
> 108 * what caused the error.
> 109 */
> 110 nvme_reset_ctrl(ns->ctrl);
> 111 break;
> 112 }
> "nvme/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c" line 112 of 739 --15%-- col 1-8
>
> This makes no sense.
So lets remove this reset. Have the transport take care of this, or do
it only when it is clearly needed.
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 19:57 [PATCH] nvme: Translate more status codes to blk_status_t Keith Busch
2019-12-12 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 19:41 ` Meneghini, John
2019-12-13 7:32 ` Meneghini, John
2019-12-13 21:02 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2019-12-16 8:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-12-16 15:30 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18f741dd-2445-141e-ea2b-4185476da8d2@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=John.Meneghini@netapp.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox