linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write boundary validation
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:19:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19e6e970-9bda-4822-8c86-e3387b1b4594@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611055432.2401372-3-hch@lst.de>

On 11/06/2025 06:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>   		ret = nvme_init_effects(ctrl, id);
>   		if (ret)
>   			goto out_free;
> +
> +		ctrl->subsys->awupf = le16_to_cpu(id->awupf);
>   	}
> +
> +	if (le16_to_cpu(id->awupf) != ctrl->subsys->awupf) {
> +		dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->device,
> +			"inconsistent AWUPF, controller not added (%u/%u).\n",
> +			le16_to_cpu(id->awupf), ctrl->subsys->awupf);

Could we just disable atomic writes instead of doing this?

Or are there bigger issues, like the value returned from 
nvme_update_disk_info() for setting the physical block size is just not 
valid?


> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_free;
> +	}
> +
>   	memcpy(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev, id->fr,
>   	       sizeof(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev));



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-11  5:54 fix atomic limits check Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11  5:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: refactor the atomic write unit detection Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-13  7:52   ` John Garry
2025-06-11  5:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write boundary validation Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-13  3:04   ` Yi Zhang
2025-06-13  8:03   ` John Garry
2025-06-16  5:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16  7:42       ` John Garry
2025-06-16 11:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 10:19   ` John Garry [this message]
2025-06-16 11:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 11:49       ` John Garry
2025-06-17  7:36   ` John Garry
2025-06-13 21:22 ` fix atomic limits check alan.adamson
2025-06-16  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 17:40     ` alan.adamson
2025-06-18  5:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-18 16:07         ` alan.adamson
     [not found]           ` <20250618171750.GA29321@lst.de>
2025-06-18 18:30             ` alan.adamson
2025-06-23 13:33               ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 17:24                 ` alan.adamson
2025-06-24 13:10                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 16:38                     ` alan.adamson
2025-06-25  6:39                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17  4:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 16:38   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19e6e970-9bda-4822-8c86-e3387b1b4594@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).