From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write boundary validation
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:19:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19e6e970-9bda-4822-8c86-e3387b1b4594@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611055432.2401372-3-hch@lst.de>
On 11/06/2025 06:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ret = nvme_init_effects(ctrl, id);
> if (ret)
> goto out_free;
> +
> + ctrl->subsys->awupf = le16_to_cpu(id->awupf);
> }
> +
> + if (le16_to_cpu(id->awupf) != ctrl->subsys->awupf) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->device,
> + "inconsistent AWUPF, controller not added (%u/%u).\n",
> + le16_to_cpu(id->awupf), ctrl->subsys->awupf);
Could we just disable atomic writes instead of doing this?
Or are there bigger issues, like the value returned from
nvme_update_disk_info() for setting the physical block size is just not
valid?
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> +
> memcpy(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev, id->fr,
> sizeof(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 5:54 fix atomic limits check Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 5:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: refactor the atomic write unit detection Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-13 7:52 ` John Garry
2025-06-11 5:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write boundary validation Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-13 3:04 ` Yi Zhang
2025-06-13 8:03 ` John Garry
2025-06-16 5:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 7:42 ` John Garry
2025-06-16 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 10:19 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-06-16 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 11:49 ` John Garry
2025-06-17 7:36 ` John Garry
2025-06-13 21:22 ` fix atomic limits check alan.adamson
2025-06-16 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 17:40 ` alan.adamson
2025-06-18 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-18 16:07 ` alan.adamson
[not found] ` <20250618171750.GA29321@lst.de>
2025-06-18 18:30 ` alan.adamson
2025-06-23 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 17:24 ` alan.adamson
2025-06-24 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 16:38 ` alan.adamson
2025-06-25 6:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 4:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 16:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19e6e970-9bda-4822-8c86-e3387b1b4594@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).