linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: willy@linux.intel.com (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: Add a character device for each nvme device
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:26:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727202655.GP22985@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5012EBD9.8010602@pobox.com>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012@03:28:25PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 02:12 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 27, 2012@10:44:18AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> >>Registers a character device for the nvme module and creates character
> >>files as /dev/nvmeN for each nvme device probed, where N is the device
> >>instance. The character devices support nvme admin ioctl commands so
> >>that nvme devices without namespaces can be managed.
> >
> >I don't see a problem here, but I'm no expert at sysfs / character devices.
> >Alan, Greg, anyone else see any problems with how this character device is
> >created / destroyed?
> 
> This seems like something normally done via a control device that is
> addressible via bsg.

I'm not convinced about that.  bsg requires a request_queue, and we
don't have one in the absence of any storage.  There doesn't even seem
to be a standard way of sending commands to SCSI hosts, let alone block
device controllers.

Maybe we should design such a mechanism, but maybe we shouldn't ... as we
find common things to do, we tend to move those to sysfs, not ioctls,
and the kinds of commands that are being sent here are essentially
vendor-specific NVMe commands; it's not clear they'd fit neatly into a
generic mechanism.

> This is -not- a NAK, but maybe the storage folks have a different
> preference for an admin-command path.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-27 16:44 [PATCH] NVMe: Add a character device for each nvme device Keith Busch
2012-07-27 18:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-07-27 18:25   ` Greg KH
2012-07-27 19:08     ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-07-27 19:21       ` Greg KH
2012-07-27 20:30         ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-07-27 19:28   ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-27 20:26     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2012-07-27 20:42       ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-27 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-02 19:10 Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120727202655.GP22985@linux.intel.com \
    --to=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).