From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:49:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 19/51] DMA-API: media: dt3155v4l: replace dma_set_mask()+dma_set_coherent_mask() with new helper In-Reply-To: <20131031094640.205840a2@samsung.com> References: <20130919212235.GD12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5249673B.5020705@xs4all.nl> <20131031094640.205840a2@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20131031144929.GC25039@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013@09:46:40AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Em Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:57:47 +0200 > Hans Verkuil escreveu: > > > On 09/19/2013 11:44 PM, Russell King wrote: > > > Replace the following sequence: > > > > > > dma_set_mask(dev, mask); > > > dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, mask); > > > > > > with a call to the new helper dma_set_mask_and_coherent(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > > > Acked-by: Hans Verkuil > > Somehow, I lost your original post (I got unsubscribed on a few days > from all vger mailing lists at the end of september). > > I suspect that you want to sent this via your tree, right? Yes please. > If so: > > Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Added, thanks. > > > - err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > > > - if (err) > > > - return -ENODEV; > > > - err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > > > + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > > > if (err) > > > return -ENODEV; One thing I've just noticed is that return should be "return err" not "return -ENODEV" - are you okay for me to change that in this patch? Thanks.