Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: willy@linux.intel.com (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/4] IO Queue fixes rewrite
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:28:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140202182833.GC2285@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391212422-14764-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014@04:53:38PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> The only patch different in v2 from the previous is the "Per-cpu IO
> queues". The feedback on using the per cpu variable to point to an index
> rather than a struct nvme_queue pointer was a great idea!
> 
> I only included all 4 in this set because I wanted to make sure they
> apply cleanly against the new tree.
> 
> I also ran sparse this time; I've exceeded my fair share of sparse errors
> working on this driver. :)

Unfortunately, you missed a CONFIG option to enable checking of __rcu.
You need CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER=y

With that enabled, I get a bunch of warnings like this:

drivers/block/nvme-core.c:942:48: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:942:48:    expected struct nvme_queue *nvmeq
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:942:48:    got struct nvme_queue [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:948:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:948:49:    expected struct nvme_queue *nvmeq
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:948:49:    got struct nvme_queue [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>

The problem is that only the IO queues need to be RCU-protected, but every
time we access the admin queue, we get a warning, because clearly there's
no way to tell sparse "element 0 of this array isn't RCU protected,
only elements 1-n are".

So ... I think I'll just include patch 1 out of this set and send a pull
request to Linux today.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-02 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-31 23:53 [PATCHv2 0/4] IO Queue fixes rewrite Keith Busch
2014-01-31 23:53 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] NVMe: Namespace use after free on surprise removal Keith Busch
2014-01-31 23:53 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] NVMe: RCU access to nvme_queue Keith Busch
2014-01-31 23:53 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] NVMe: Per-cpu IO queues Keith Busch
2014-01-31 23:53 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] NVMe: CPU hot plug notification Keith Busch
2014-02-02 18:28 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140202182833.GC2285@linux.intel.com \
    --to=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox