From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:31:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Reference count open namespaces
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1510021417360.23840@localhost.lm.intel.com>
References: <1443741251-13274-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <1443741251-13274-2-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <20151002125932.GA11175@infradead.org>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1510021417360.23840@localhost.lm.intel.com>
Message-ID: <20151002143156.GA20337@infradead.org>

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015@02:26:22PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Shouldn't each namesapce have a reference on the nvme_dev while we're at
> >it?
> 
> We just need to make a small change to the device removal. An orderly
> removal won't drop the final namespace ref until after the last device ref
> is closed first. This relationship isn't necessary and can be simplified
> even more if we remove it.
> 
> Should I fix and resend this patch, or patch on top of this one?

Doing that on top of this patch sounds fine to me.