From: snitzer@redhat.com (Mike Snitzer)
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:33:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021153351.GA4984@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445439679.3126.5.camel@hasee>
On Wed, Oct 21 2015 at 11:01am -0400,
Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-21@09:39 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> writes:
> >
> > > Jens, Ming:
> > >
> > > are you fine with the one liner change to get back to the old I/O
> > > pattern? While it looks like the cards fault I'd like to avoid this
> > > annoying regression.
> >
> > I'm not Jens or Ming, but your patch looks fine to me, though you'll
> > want to remove the MAX_BIO_SECTORS definition since it's now unused.
> > It's not clear to me why the limit was lowered in the first place.
>
> UINT_MAX >> 9 is not power of 2 and it causes dm-thinp discard fails.
>
> At the lengthy discussion:
> [PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios
> We agreed to cap discard to 2G as an interim solution for 4.3 until the
> dm-thinp discard code is rewritten.
But did Jens ever commit that change to cap at 2G? I don't recall
seeing it.
> Hi Mike,
>
> Will the dm-thinp discard rewritten ready for 4.4?
No. I'm not clear what needs changing in dm-thinp. I'll have to
revisit the thread to refresh my memory.
BTW, DM thinp can easily handle discards that aren't a power-of-2 so
long as the requested discard is a factor of the thinp blocksize.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-21 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <1439363241-31772-6-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
2015-10-13 11:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-13 17:44 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-14 13:27 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-14 16:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}B Keith Busch
2015-10-14 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 16:02 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 16:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Martin K. Petersen
2015-10-21 17:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-21 18:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 20:13 ` Ming Lin
2015-10-22 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 11:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 13:39 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Jeff Moyer
2015-10-21 15:01 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-21 15:33 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-10-21 17:18 ` Ming Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151021153351.GA4984@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).