linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: snitzer@redhat.com (Mike Snitzer)
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:02:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151021160232.GA5089@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014132700.GA19401@infradead.org>

On Wed, Oct 14 2015 at  9:27am -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015@10:44:11AM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > I just did a quick test with a Samsung 900G NVMe device.
> > mkfs.xfs is OK on 4.3-rc5.
> > 
> > What's your device model? I may find a similar one to try.
> 
> This is a HGST Ultrastar SN100
> 
> Analsys and tentativ fix below:
> 
> blktrace for before the commit:
> 
> 259,0    1        2     0.000002543  2394  G   D 0 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    1        3     0.000008230  2394  I   D 0 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    1        4     0.000031090   207  D   D 0 + 8388607 [kworker/1:1H]
> 259,0    1        5     0.000044869  2394  Q   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    1        6     0.000045992  2394  G   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    1        7     0.000049559  2394  I   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    1        8     0.000061551   207  D   D 8388607 + 8388607 [kworker/1:1H]
> 
> .. and so on.
> 
> blktrace with the commit:
> 
> 259,0    2        1     0.000000000  1228  Q   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        2     0.000002543  1228  G   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        3     0.000010080  1228  I   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        4     0.000082187   267  D   D 0 + 4194304 [kworker/2:1H]
> 259,0    2        5     0.000224869  1228  Q   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        6     0.000225835  1228  G   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        7     0.000229457  1228  I   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
> 259,0    2        8     0.000238507   267  D   D 4194304 + 4194304 [kworker/2:1H]
> 
> So discards are smaller, but better aligned.  Now if I tweak a single
> line in blk-lib.c to be able to use all of bi_size I get the old I/O
> pattern back and everything works fine again:
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index bd40292..65b61dc 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, MAX_BIO_SECTORS);
> +		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, UINT_MAX >> 9);
>  		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
>  
>  		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;

Can we change UINT_MAX >> 9 to rounddown to the first factor of
minimum_io_size?

That should work for all devices and for dm-thinp (and dm-cache) in
particular will ensure that all discards that are issued will be a
multiple of the underlying device's blocksize.

Mike

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <1439363241-31772-6-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
2015-10-13 11:50   ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-13 17:44     ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-14 13:27       ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-14 16:38         ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}B Keith Busch
2015-10-14 16:50           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 16:02         ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-10-21 16:19           ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 16:33             ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Martin K. Petersen
2015-10-21 17:33             ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-21 18:18               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 20:13                 ` Ming Lin
2015-10-22 10:24                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 11:22                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21  7:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-21 13:39         ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard, write_same} Jeff Moyer
2015-10-21 15:01           ` [PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} Ming Lin
2015-10-21 15:33             ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-21 17:18               ` Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151021160232.GA5089@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).