From: keith.busch@intel.com (Busch, Keith)
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] nvme: abort requests on the reqeueue list when shutting down a controller
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:16:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022151625.GC21840@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022145842.GA32062@lst.de>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015@04:58:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We're aborting all active commands through nvme_dev_shutdown ->
> nvme_clear_queue. Why would we skip commands that were active and are
> going to be active again ASAP?
This is a bit subtle. nvme_clear_queue at the end of shutdown allows
active commands being aborted to requeue based on the state of the
namespace's request_queue: if it isn't "dying", nvme_clear_queue won't
set NVMe CQE "do-not-retry" (DNR) bit, so req_completion may requeue.
In the reset scenario, this change would fail requests that happen to be
on the requeue_list, but active commands being cancelled will be allowed
to retry. That's not fair to requests that got on the list early. :)
But it sounds like you may have found the real fix to the gap in a
different patch, so I'll skip this as suggested and continue with the
rest of the series.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 12:03 nvme abort and reset fixes Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] nvme: only add a controller to dev_list after it's been fully initialized Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] nvme: don't take the I/O queue q_lock in nvme_timeout Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] nvme: merge nvme_abort_req and nvme_timeout Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvme: do not restart the request timeout if we're resetting the controller Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 16:27 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 16:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 17:15 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 18:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvme: simplify resets Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: abort requests on the reqeueue list when shutting down a controller Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 14:44 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 15:16 ` Busch, Keith [this message]
2015-10-22 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme: merge probe_work and reset_work Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme: remove dead controllers from a work item Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 18:10 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-22 20:36 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-23 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-23 14:51 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-23 19:31 ` Busch, Keith
2015-10-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: switch abort_limit to an atomic_t Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151022151625.GC21840@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox