From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH for-4.4] block: split bios to max possible length
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:21:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106162117.GE15113@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVM7BDvqWREUaZtbf+LwxLUWEgDrgrOyXPObE7H1PjHsAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016@11:43:45PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Please see the 1st line code of __blk_segment_map_sg(), in which only
> one whole bvec is handled, and partial bvec can't be figured out there.
>
> Think of it further, drivers often use bv.bv_len directly in the
> iterator, for example:
>
> bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter)
> memcpy(page_address(bvec.bv_page) +
> bvec.bv_offset, addr +
> offset, bvec.bv_len);
>
> So your patch will break these drivers, won't it?
CC'ing Kent in hopes he will clarify what happens on a split.
The bio_advance() code comments say it's handled:
"
* This updates bi_sector, bi_size and bi_idx; if the number of bytes to
* complete doesn't align with a bvec boundary, then bv_len and bv_offset will
* be updated on the last bvec as well.
"
I admit I'm having a hard time seeing where bv_len and bv_offset updated
in this path. It was obviously handled after 054bdf646e then changed
with 4550dd6c6b.
If I follow correctly, 4550dd6c6b will implicity update the bvec's offset
and length during the split here since bio_iter_iovec resets the bvec's
length and offset:
---
#define __bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, start) \
for (iter = (start); \
(iter).bi_size && \
((bvl = bio_iter_iovec((bio), (iter))), 1); \
bio_advance_iter((bio), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len))
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-04 18:24 [PATCH for-4.4] block: split bios to max possible length Keith Busch
2016-01-05 4:54 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-05 15:09 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06 2:17 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 5:51 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06 6:29 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 6:53 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 15:18 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06 15:43 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 16:21 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-01-07 0:14 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-07 10:46 ` Kent Overstreet
2016-01-09 11:10 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 15:29 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06 9:46 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160106162117.GE15113@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox