Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH for-4.4] block: split bios to max possible length
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:21:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106162117.GE15113@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVM7BDvqWREUaZtbf+LwxLUWEgDrgrOyXPObE7H1PjHsAQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016@11:43:45PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Please see the 1st line code of __blk_segment_map_sg(), in which only
> one whole bvec is handled, and partial bvec can't be figured out there.
> 
> Think of it further, drivers often use bv.bv_len directly in the
> iterator, for example:
> 
>         bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter)
>                 memcpy(page_address(bvec.bv_page) +
>                                             bvec.bv_offset,  addr +
> offset, bvec.bv_len);
> 
> So your patch will break these drivers, won't it?

CC'ing Kent in hopes he will clarify what happens on a split.

The bio_advance() code comments say it's handled:

"
 * This updates bi_sector, bi_size and bi_idx; if the number of bytes to
 * complete doesn't align with a bvec boundary, then bv_len and bv_offset will
 * be updated on the last bvec as well.
"

I admit I'm having a hard time seeing where bv_len and bv_offset updated
in this path. It was obviously handled after 054bdf646e then changed
with 4550dd6c6b.

If I follow correctly, 4550dd6c6b will implicity update the bvec's offset
and length during the split here since bio_iter_iovec resets the bvec's
length and offset:
---
#define __bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, start)			\
	for (iter = (start);						\
	     (iter).bi_size &&						\
		((bvl = bio_iter_iovec((bio), (iter))), 1);		\
	     bio_advance_iter((bio), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len))
--

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-06 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-04 18:24 [PATCH for-4.4] block: split bios to max possible length Keith Busch
2016-01-05  4:54 ` Ming Lei
2016-01-05 15:09   ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06  2:17     ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06  5:51       ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06  6:29         ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06  6:53           ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 15:18             ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06 15:43               ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 16:21                 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-01-07  0:14                   ` Ming Lei
2016-01-07 10:46                   ` Kent Overstreet
2016-01-09 11:10                     ` Ming Lei
2016-01-06 15:29           ` Keith Busch
2016-01-06  9:46         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160106162117.GE15113@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox