From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] NVMe: Introduce CMB allocation scheme
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:08:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113000838.GA5803@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160106201308.GB21311@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016@08:13:08PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015@10:47:56AM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > This patchset changes the CMB allocation scheme. Instead of reserving
> > the entire range for SQes and automatically placing the SQes in the CMB,
> > this set creates sysfs knobs to manage it. This allows partial usage of
> > the CMB for SQes, so that the remainder can be mmapped or used for other
> > NVMe-defined CMB usages.
>
> Thanks, Jon.
>
> In general, I like the control and visibility this provides. With this,
> I think we're on the verge of warranting a new drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> file to keep all the nvme sysfs management in one place.
>
> I don't think anyone is in a rush to see this in the 4.5 merge window,
> so I'll load this on a CMB capable machine and provide a more thorough
> review in the next week or so.
One potential problem, this allows the queue depth to change on a live
request_queue. The block layer won't allow that right now. That can
also theoretically happen on a controller reset, but doesn't happen in
real life (that I know of). For this CMB proposal to really be useful,
we need a new blk-mq API to let us change the depth at runtime.
I thought the dynamic h/w contexts patch[1] was 'ok' and may have
provided a route to change the depth as well. That patch, though, saw a
0-day boot failure. The failure was incorrectly sent to my spam folder,
and I only noticed it this week. If that can be acceptably resolved,
then it looks possible to alter the queue depth with a bit more work.
---
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2015-December/003452.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-30 17:47 [PATCH 0/3] NVMe: Introduce CMB allocation scheme Jon Derrick
2015-12-30 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] NVMe: Introduce sysfs entries for submission queues in CMB Jon Derrick
2015-12-30 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] NVMe: Generate resource tree for CMB Jon Derrick
2015-12-30 20:59 ` Jon Derrick
2015-12-30 17:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] NVMe: Create CMB resource sysfs file Jon Derrick
2016-01-06 20:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] NVMe: Introduce CMB allocation scheme Keith Busch
2016-01-06 21:24 ` Stephen Bates
2016-01-13 0:08 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-01-13 0:27 ` Jon Derrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160113000838.GA5803@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox