From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:53:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160126165334.GB609@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453757017-13640-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
> +static void __nvme_start_queue_locked(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> +{
> + queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, ns->queue);
> + blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(ns->queue, true);
> + blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ns->queue);
> +}
This almost screams for a block level helper.
> +
> static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> {
> bool kill = nvme_io_incapable(ns->ctrl) &&
> @@ -1187,15 +1194,20 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>
> if (kill) {
> blk_set_queue_dying(ns->queue);
> + mb();
Please always comment memory barriers, I can't really make any sense
of this one.
> /*
> * The controller was shutdown first if we got here through
> * device removal. The shutdown may requeue outstanding
> * requests. These need to be aborted immediately so
> * del_gendisk doesn't block indefinitely for their completion.
> + * The queue needs to be restarted to let pending requests
> + * fail.
> */
> blk_mq_abort_requeue_list(ns->queue);
> + __nvme_start_queue_locked(ns);
Also why do we need a kick of the requeue list above if we just aborted
all requests on it?
> index 72ef832..bdf148e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,10 @@ static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> struct nvme_command cmnd;
> int ret = BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
>
> + if (unlikely(blk_queue_dying(req->q))) {
> + blk_mq_end_request(req, -EIO);
> + return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
> + }
Seems like this is something blk-mq should be doing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-26 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 21:23 [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again Keith Busch
2016-01-25 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] NVMe: Fix io incapable return values Keith Busch
2016-01-26 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 18:11 ` Ming Lin
2016-01-27 11:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-26 16:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-01-26 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again Keith Busch
2016-01-27 11:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 14:19 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-28 14:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-28 14:55 ` Keith Busch
2016-01-28 15:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-01 15:01 ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 15:27 ` Busch, Keith
[not found] ` <B58D82457FDA0744A320A2FC5AC253B93D3D7E57@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
2016-02-02 1:17 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 2:41 ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02 5:29 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160126165334.GB609@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).