linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: do not touch sq door bell if nvmeq has been suspended
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:25:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202172503.GC10728@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BJXPR01MB19940BA759DBBADC6BF6BD2E0DF0@BJXPR01MB199.CHNPR01.prod.partner.outlook.cn>

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016@07:15:57AM +0000, Wenbo Wang wrote:
> Jens,
> 
> I did the following test to validate the issue.
> 
> 1. Modify code as below to increase the chance of races.
> 	Add 10s delay after nvme_dev_unmap() in nvme_dev_disable()
> 	Add 10s delay before __nvme_submit_cmd()

If running sync IO, preempt is disabled. You can't just put a 10 second
delay there. Wouldn't you hit a "scheduling while atomic" bug instead?

If blk-mq is running the h/w context from its work queue, that might
be a different issue. Maybe we can change the "cancel_delayed_work" to
"cancel_delayed_work_sync" in blk_mq_stop_hw_queues.

If there's still a window where blk-mq can insert a request after the
driver requested to stop queues, I think we should try to close it with
the block layer.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01 15:42 [PATCH] NVMe: do not touch sq door bell if nvmeq has been suspended Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 15:59 ` Busch, Keith
2016-02-01 16:17   ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-02  7:15   ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02 12:41     ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 14:27       ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 14:33         ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 14:46           ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 17:20             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-03  0:49               ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02 17:25     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-02-03  0:19       ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-03 14:41     ` Keith Busch
2016-02-03 16:35       ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-03 16:38         ` Keith Busch
2016-02-06 14:32           ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-07 13:41             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 15:01             ` Keith Busch
2016-02-09 11:22               ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-09 22:55                 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160202172503.GC10728@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).