From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH v2 RFC] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 01:05:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160503080552.GA13239@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461262295.4797.11.camel@ssi>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016@11:11:35AM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > agreement on it, although once the basic agreement is there it
> > shouldn't be too hard to also support the older google specific
> > version. And this is no new feedback, a couple of people including
> > me said that a long time ago, and we've seen zero action on it.
>
> For "action", did you mean the "agreement" or the spec extension
> proposal?
>
> I think you'll make the proposal, right?
No, we really need Google to bring it in.
> I made the mess :)
>
> I thought this before.
> Probably add a new file ext.c and move these code into it.
>
> Then add a nvme_ext_ops ...
Uh, no. Just have some inline helpers that do the right thing
for the right "hardware".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-03 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 18:04 [PATCH v2 RFC] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices Helen Mae Koike Fornazier
2016-04-21 13:33 ` Helen Koike
2016-04-21 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-21 18:11 ` Ming Lin
2016-04-27 15:26 ` Helen Koike
2016-05-03 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-05-04 16:48 ` Helen Koike
2016-05-05 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-11 16:50 ` Helen Koike
2016-05-11 17:43 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-12 4:05 ` Helen Koike
2016-05-12 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CALu-fzt8=kmzZDqKsRYE42Q+F+Zu3U_s6XErpd9izXdxG1cUMA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPst7KAAymUqbNwzxNAczduF6iLXQAMm5-auEdXZ_zHwhHtbWQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-12 17:29 ` Mike Waychison
2016-05-05 15:15 ` Helen Koike
2016-05-05 15:24 ` Helen Koike
2016-08-16 1:41 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 0/2] Virtual NVMe device optimization Helen Koike
2016-08-16 1:41 ` [PATCH v3 RFC 2/2] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices Helen Koike
2016-08-16 20:45 ` J Freyensee
2016-08-16 23:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-03-17 21:44 ` [PATCH v4 RFC] " Helen Koike
2017-03-17 22:28 ` Keith Busch
2017-03-17 22:26 ` Helen Koike
2017-03-24 4:23 ` [PATCH v5 " Helen Koike
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 16:04 ` Helen Koike
2017-03-27 16:25 ` Helen Koike
2017-03-27 14:43 ` Keith Busch
2017-03-27 16:50 ` [PATCH v6 " Helen Koike
2017-03-30 17:33 ` Keith Busch
2017-03-30 17:46 ` [PATCH v7 " Helen Koike
2017-03-31 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-01 21:50 ` Helen Koike
2017-04-10 15:31 ` Helen Koike
2017-04-10 15:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 15:51 ` [PATCH v8] " Helen Koike
2017-04-14 18:10 ` Helen Koike
2017-04-17 23:01 ` Keith Busch
2017-04-17 23:20 ` Helen Koike
2017-04-20 10:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160503080552.GA13239@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).