From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:00:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624080044.GA17446@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576CE504.5020101@jbeekman.nl>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016@12:45:08AM -0700, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> As you found NVMe points to SPC-4. SPC-4 lists protocol 0xEF "ATA Device Server
> Password Security" as part of the SECURITY PROTOCOL IN command, pointing to
> SAT-2. In one SAT-2 draft I could find there is are these sections
>
> 12 SAT-specific SCSI extensions
> 12.5 SAT-specific Security Protocols
> 12.5.1 ATA Device Server Password Security Protocol
>
> which provide a pretty straightforward translation of the ATA SECURITY feature
> set (except that there is a new command to gather information that would
> normally be part of ATA IDENTIFY). I have implemented all this and it seems to
> work on my drive.
Oh, fun. Can you add a little file in Documentation that explains this
chain and how we end up building the NVMe commands?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-19 23:06 [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: When scanning namespaces, make sure the drive is not locked Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: Add function for NVMe security receive command Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Check if drive is locked using ATA Security Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 6:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives Sagi Grimberg
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 15:26 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-20 18:21 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-20 22:54 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-21 3:50 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:45 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160624080044.GA17446@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).