From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@infradead.org ('Christoph Hellwig') Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:50:11 -0700 Subject: target crash / host hang with nvme-all.3 branch of nvme-fabrics In-Reply-To: <014601d1d07e$e9196f70$bb4c4e50$@opengridcomputing.com> References: <20160616145724.GA32635@infradead.org> <017001d1c7e7$95057270$bf105750$@opengridcomputing.com> <5763044A.9090206@grimberg.me> <005f01d1c8a1$5a229240$0e67b6c0$@opengridcomputing.com> <007801d1c8a2$d6056530$82102f90$@opengridcomputing.com> <57668896.7090308@grimberg.me> <006e01d1cbc7$d0d9cc40$728d64c0$@opengridcomputing.com> <002201d1cc8b$e3f66030$abe32090$@opengridcomputing.com> <014601d1d07e$e9196f70$bb4c4e50$@opengridcomputing.com> Message-ID: <20160628085011.GA7680@infradead.org> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016@09:19:26AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > It appears this OOM issue is resolved in linux-4.7-rc5. Does it make sense to > publish a rebased nvmf-all? I'd rather get everything into Jens' tree... Either way - I suspect the fix you need is this one: http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/block/blk-lib.c?h=for-linus&id=05bd92dddc595d74ea645e793c1f3bd4b1fc251a but that won't be in the for-next tree either.