From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:15:26 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to
 avoid allocation for small reads
In-Reply-To: <157675f0-0576-1cc9-1f99-c0944185e3c5@grimberg.me>
References: <1470040599-7294-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me>
 <20160802125042.GB13235@lst.de>
 <157675f0-0576-1cc9-1f99-c0944185e3c5@grimberg.me>
Message-ID: <20160802161526.GA14964@obsidianresearch.com>

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016@04:38:58PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> that is currently being sent (its a rare race condition, but
> theoretically possible). The reason is that we repost the inline data
> buffer for receive before we post the send request. We used to have

?? The same buffer is posted at the same time for send and recv? That
is never OK, SRQ or not.

Jason