linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:30:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160906173053.GC25201@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906165056.GB26214@lst.de>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016@06:50:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [adding Thomas as it's about the affinity_mask he (we) added to the
>  IRQ core]
> > Here's my topology info:
> > 
> >   # numactl --hardware
> >   available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >   node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> >   node 0 size: 15745 MB
> >   node 0 free: 15319 MB
> >   node 1 cpus: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> >   node 1 size: 16150 MB
> >   node 1 free: 15758 MB
> >   node distances:
> >   node   0   1
> >     0:  10  21
> >     1:  21  10
> 
> How do you get that mapping?  Does this CPU use Hyperthreading and
> thus expose siblings using topology_sibling_cpumask?  As that's the
> only thing the old code used for any sort of special casing.
> 
> I'll need to see if I can find a system with such a mapping to reproduce.

Yes, this is a two-socket server with hyperthreading enabled. Numbering
the physical CPUs before the hyperthreads is a common numbering on
x86, so we're going to see this split numbering on any multi-socket
hyperthreaded server.

The topology_sibling_cpumask shows the right information. The resulting
mask from cpu 0 on my server is 0x00010001; cpu 1 is 0x00020002, etc...

> > What we want for my CPU topology is the 16th CPU to pair with CPU 0,
> > 17 pairs with 1, 18 with 2, and so on. You can't convey that information
> > with this scheme. We need affinity_masks per vector.
> 
> We actually have per-vector masks, but they are hidden inside the IRQ
> core and awkward to use.  We could to the get_first_sibling magic
> in the block-mq queue mapping (and in fact with the current code I guess
> we need to).  Or take a step back from trying to emulate the old code
> and instead look at NUMA nodes instead of siblings which some folks
> suggested a while ago.

Adding the first sibling magic in blk-mq would fix my specific case,
but it doesn't help genericly when we need to pair more than just thread
siblings.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-06 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29 10:53 blk-mq: allow passing in an external queue mapping V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: don't redistribute hardware queues on a CPU hotplug event Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: only allocate a single mq_map per tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: remove ->map_queue Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-31 16:38   ` Keith Busch
2016-09-01  8:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-01 14:24       ` Keith Busch
2016-09-01 23:30         ` Keith Busch
2016-09-05 19:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-06 14:39           ` Keith Busch
2016-09-06 16:50             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-06 17:30               ` Keith Busch [this message]
2016-09-07 15:38               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvme: remove the post_scan callout Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-29 10:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: get rid of the cpumask in struct blk_mq_tags Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 23:28 ` blk-mq: allow passing in an external queue mapping V2 Keith Busch
2016-09-01  8:45   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160906173053.GC25201@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).