From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:46:39 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] nvme: Implement resume_from_suspend and SED
 Allocation code.
In-Reply-To: <20161220154916.GC10634@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1482176149-2257-1-git-send-email-scott.bauer@intel.com>
 <1482176149-2257-5-git-send-email-scott.bauer@intel.com>
 <20161219215954.GB10634@localhost.localdomain>
 <20161219222311.GA2056@sbauer-Z170X-UD5>
 <20161220061744.GB4765@infradead.org>
 <20161220154916.GC10634@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20161220154639.GA16393@infradead.org>

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016@10:49:16AM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016@10:17:44PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > As far as I can tell Security Send / Receive has always been intended to
> > apply to the whole controller, even if that's something I would not
> > personally think is a good idea.
> 
> NVMe security commands required the namespace ID since the very
> beginning. It's currently documented in figure 42 of section 5,
> "Namespace Identifier Used" column.

Oh, for some reason I read a no there when looking it up.
Good to know, although TCG spec still seem to ignore it.