From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: Bug/Issue report: removing nvme device don't ack the target core
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:30:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170103153048.GA21060@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa67387b-14db-b828-ff2c-efc8c80e0072@mellanox.com>
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017@04:07:58PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> I've noticed that in case I have nvme device configured and I decided to
> remove it by "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/nvme/<pci>/remove" then the nvme
> ctrl is freed. later on when I run "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan" I get the
> same block device name (e.g nvme0n1) - Expected result.
>
> Other test is when I do it with nvme target configured and /dev/nvme0n1 is
> assigned to a namespace as device_path. In that case the nvme target take
> another refcount on the ns (by calling blkdev_get_by_path) so the pci remove
> will not free the nvme ctrl accordinglly. In that case when I rescan the pci
> bus by "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan" I get *different* block device name
> (e.g nvme1n1) to the same backing store device.
>
> I wonder if it's a bug ?
> Maybe we need to notify all block device openers that something caused the
> device removal and call some callback funtion to release it's resources
> (maybe in del_gendisk).
>
> If it's an expected behaviour, how should the initiator recover from it ? I
> don't see a way that his traffic will succeed in case we remove the pci
> device and bring it back again.
I think you'd need to open a different device that indirectly maps to
the nvme disk with some persisitent name, like by the device's unique
identifier, or a partition's uuid.
The nvme driver's only concern is to provide a unique name. For all it
knows, the nvme drive it binds to after your pci rescan is a completely
different drive from the one it previously deleted, so it can't rebind
it the previous name while it's still in use by something else.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-03 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-02 14:07 Bug/Issue report: removing nvme device don't ack the target core Max Gurtovoy
2017-01-03 15:30 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170103153048.GA21060@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox