From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:09:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] MicroSemi Switchtec management interface driver In-Reply-To: <9a1d4150-b329-1a69-9efd-f06da32afe02@deltatee.com> References: <1486058763-7730-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <1486058763-7730-2-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <20170210145124.GA24594@kroah.com> <20170210165550.GA23959@kroah.com> <9a1d4150-b329-1a69-9efd-f06da32afe02@deltatee.com> Message-ID: <20170210170910.GA25450@kroah.com> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017@10:03:10AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On 10/02/17 09:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Yes, but try it yourself to verify it really is correct :) > > Yes, of course... turns out it wasn't. I accidentally refereed to dev > before I assigned it. I had mainly just wanted your feedback to ensure > that switching to device_register made sense. > > > And it can just be an add-on patch, no need to respin a whole new > > version for just that simple change, it doesn't hurt anything as-is, > > it's just "not needed". > > Ok... How should I do that exactly? Attempt to reply to the thread with > another patch? Sure, or just wait for these to be applied to the PCI tree and then send a follow-on patch. It's up to Bjorn really, as to what he wants. thanks, greg k-h