From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Complete all stuck requests
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:27:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170217152713.GA27158@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486768553-13738-6-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
> u32 csts = -1;
> + bool drain_queue = pci_is_enabled(to_pci_dev(dev->dev));
>
> del_timer_sync(&dev->watchdog_timer);
> cancel_work_sync(&dev->reset_work);
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->shutdown_lock);
> - if (pci_is_enabled(to_pci_dev(dev->dev))) {
> + if (drain_queue) {
> + if (shutdown)
> + nvme_start_freeze(&dev->ctrl);
So if the devices is enabled and we are going to shut the device
down we're going to freeze all I/O queues here.
Question 1: why skip the freeze if we are not shutting down?
> nvme_stop_queues(&dev->ctrl);
Especially as we're now going to wait for all I/O to finish here in
all shutdown cases.
> csts = readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS);
> }
> @@ -1701,6 +1704,25 @@ static void nvme_dev_disable(struct nvme_dev *dev, bool shutdown)
>
> blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&dev->tagset, nvme_cancel_request, &dev->ctrl);
> blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&dev->admin_tagset, nvme_cancel_request, &dev->ctrl);
And kill all busy requests down here.
> +
> + /*
> + * If shutting down, the driver will not be starting up queues again,
> + * so must drain all entered requests to their demise to avoid
> + * deadlocking blk-mq hot-cpu notifier.
> + */
> + if (drain_queue && shutdown) {
> + nvme_start_queues(&dev->ctrl);
> + /*
> + * Waiting for frozen increases the freeze depth. Since we
> + * already start the freeze earlier in this function to stop
> + * incoming requests, we have to unfreeze after froze to get
> + * the depth back to the desired.
> + */
> + nvme_wait_freeze(&dev->ctrl);
> + nvme_unfreeze(&dev->ctrl);
> + nvme_stop_queues(&dev->ctrl);
And all this (just like the start_free + quience sequence above)
really sounds like something we'd need to move to the core.
> + /*
> + * If we are resuming from suspend, the queue was set to freeze
> + * to prevent blk-mq's hot CPU notifier from getting stuck on
> + * requests that entered the queue that NVMe had quiesced. Now
> + * that we are resuming and have notified blk-mq of the new h/w
> + * context queue count, it is safe to unfreeze the queues.
> + */
> + if (was_suspend)
> + nvme_unfreeze(&dev->ctrl);
And this change I don't understand at all. It doesn't seem to pair
up with anything else in the patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-17 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 23:15 [PATCH 0/5] NVMe pci fixes, for-4.11 Keith Busch
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme/pci: Disable on removal when disconnected Keith Busch
2017-02-13 10:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-13 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme/pci: Cancel work after watchdog disabled Keith Busch
2017-02-13 10:25 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-13 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme/core: Fix race kicking freed request_queue Keith Busch
2017-02-13 10:33 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-13 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme/pci: No special case for queue busy on IO Keith Busch
2017-02-13 13:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme/pci: Complete all stuck requests Keith Busch
2017-02-15 9:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-02-15 15:46 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-15 16:04 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-02-15 17:36 ` J Freyensee
2017-02-16 9:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-02-16 22:51 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-17 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-15 18:14 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-12-14 3:36 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-28 2:22 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-02-17 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-02-17 16:33 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-20 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 15:57 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-22 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-22 14:45 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-23 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-23 15:21 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-23 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 21:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-02-21 23:26 ` Keith Busch
2017-02-15 9:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] NVMe pci fixes, for-4.11 Sagi Grimberg
[not found] <20170313153319.fmy6ww72fjtx74xq@merlins.org>
[not found] ` <20170313143649.GC6994@localhost.localdomain>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170217152713.GA27158@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox