From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: leon@kernel.org (Leon Romanovsky) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:42:45 +0200 Subject: mlx4_core 0000:07:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full and OOM observed during stress test on reset_controller In-Reply-To: <20170308154815.GB24437@lst.de> References: <1908657724.31179983.1488539944957.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <2013049462.31187009.1488542111040.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20170305081206.GI14379@mtr-leonro.local> <20170308154815.GB24437@lst.de> Message-ID: <20170309084245.GX14379@mtr-leonro.local> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017@04:48:15PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Why is that system using swiotlb? mlx4 really doesn't have any > weird addressing limits, does it? As far as we know, there are not. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: