Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:09:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170428140923.GA32073@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49inlpsoey.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017@02:20:21PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi, Christoph,
> 
> Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> writes:
> 
> > Remove the request_idx parameter, which can't be used safely now that we
> > support I/O schedulers with blk-mq.  Except for a superflous check in
> > mtip32xx it was unused anyway.
> 
> I'm not sure how your patch builds.  If I look at the mtip32xx driver in
> for-4.12/post-merge, I see this:

Meh, you're right.  It did build fine when I tested it based on Jens'
for-4.12/block + my nvme PR.  But it seems like the post-merge merge
branch doesn't have the previous mtip32xxx fix yet that is a prerequisite
for this change.  Jens:  any idea why?  I'm getting lost in the maze
of branches..

> If you got rid of request_idx, then this shouldn't build.  So, is there
> some other prerequisite patch I'm missing?

Yes, both you and I are.  It's "mtip32xx: use runtime tag to initialize
command header" which is in Jens' for-4.12/block tree, but not in the
post-merge one.

> 
> Note that the patch that introduced the request_idx check fixed a bug,
> where module load would walk off the end of an array.  See commit
> 74c9c9134bf8.

Yes, but that behavior is gone with the above patch, which was
necessary to support blk-mq I/O schedulers.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27 17:44 update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 18:20   ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-28 14:09     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-04-28 14:19       ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:20         ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-28 14:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:27       ` Jeff Moyer
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-pci: merge init_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-rdma: merge init_request and exit_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-fc: merge init_request methods Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-27 17:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-loop: " Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-28 14:53 ` update ->init_request and ->exit_request prototypes Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-03  7:53   ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170428140923.GA32073@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox