From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:35:59 +0200
Subject: Centralize nvme controller reset, delete and fabrics periodic
 reconnects
In-Reply-To: <964d191e-0fe4-e440-71e6-0fd186d4f52b@grimberg.me>
References: <1502790745-12569-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me>
 <20170816081605.GA29784@infradead.org>
 <964d191e-0fe4-e440-71e6-0fd186d4f52b@grimberg.me>
Message-ID: <20170816093559.GA24709@lst.de>

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017@12:33:47PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> This set applies on nvme-4.14 plus 4.13 recent fixes.
>>
>> I can't get this applied at all.
>
> That's probably because this is on top of the rdma affinity
> patches which are already in Doug's tree...
>
>> A pointer to a git repo would
>> always be nice for patchsets as large as this one, especially if
>> the base is a bit murky..
>
> Sure, should I have it on top of the affinity patches or not?

For now get any tree you have out to take a look.  In the longer
run we'll need to decide how we want to deal with the merge
of the two trees.  In general having to depend on the RDMA
tree is a major risk because it's maintainance is so unreliable.

If it's in a branch of its own we could pull it in through and
send that bit through both trees.