From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] nvme: track shared namespaces
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:25:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170924152531.GA16753@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921151631.GA10713@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017@11:16:31AM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> If there weren't resistence to renaming structs, it would be more
> aligned to how the specification calls these if we rename nvme_ns to
> nvme_ns_path, and what you're calling nvme_ns_head is should just be
> the nvme_ns.
Then we'd still need a good name for what's now nvme_ns :)
But seriously speaking - I'm a little worried because Linus is really
pissed at me for doing major refactoring in block land (by proxy of
Jens who gets all the heat). I just don't feel comfortable with a
rename at the moment, even if it's the right thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-24 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 23:14 nvme multipath support V2 Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 1/9] nvme: allow timed-out ios to retry Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: move REQ_NOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: add REQ_DRV bit Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: provide a direct_make_request helper Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: add a blk_steal_bios helper Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: track subsystems Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 22:52 ` Keith Busch
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme: introduce a nvme_ns_ids structure Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 8:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme: track shared namespaces Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 8:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-20 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 5:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-21 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 15:16 ` Keith Busch
2017-09-24 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-09-18 23:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: implement multipath access to nvme subsystems Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 0:18 ` Tony Yang
2017-09-20 8:15 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-20 9:42 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-20 22:58 ` Keith Busch
2017-09-20 23:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 21:12 ` Keith Busch
2017-09-24 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-22 15:09 ` Keith Busch
2017-09-24 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-20 11:09 ` nvme multipath support V2 Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-20 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 5:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-21 14:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-22 0:21 ` Tony Yang
2017-09-24 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170924152531.GA16753@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox