From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] nvme: claim block devices
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:13:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004071312.GA21143@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19dbdf11-86c4-b6ea-a18c-a78fcae822d5@suse.de>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017@08:33:07AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017@07:42:00AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> Hmm. Not sure how you would be doing that. Who should be doing the
> >> claiming? Typically the claim is done whenever a device is created on
> >> top of the other...
> >
> > We'd need a callback in the driver if it is claimed, and use that
> > to for propagating the claim, or use a shared struture to record the
> > claim. I haven't looked into the details yet, though.
> >
> >> What about an alternative plan: make creation of the subsystem device
> >> fully dynamic.
> >> But if a subsystem device is created it will always claim the underlying
> >> device. Then we can make the creation dependent on the NMIC attribute,
> >> and existing setups would not be affected.
> >
> > This doesn't work because a lot of devices can just set NMIC. E.g.
> > every namespace exported by the Linux NVMe target.
> >
> But as it's fully dynamic we can decide how to handle each device on a
> device-by-device basis, with a common default policy.
What do you mean with fully dynamic?
> My idea is to have a default policy (create/not create subsystem devices
> if NMIC is set) set via kernel command-line, and udev rules for devices
> requiring separate handling.
Yikes. That's exactly where I do _not_ want to go. No more arcane
magic setup that you need to be in the in group for to know like
dm-multipath. Things must just work, period.
The only other option I could think of would be to turn names around:
make /dev/nvmeX (chardev) and /dev/nvmeXnY the per-subsystem devices
that are multipathed if available. We'd then need new devices for the
invdividual controllers. With a little luck we'd get away with just
creating character devices. This would however create a problem for
dm-multipath users, which mostly is you and your paterners/customers.
Note that in general dm-multipath should continue working but it would
generally just see one path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 13:55 [PATCH 0/6] nvme: sanitize multipathing Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme: display 'CMIC' controller attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] nvme: use 'nvmsXnZ' instead of 'nvm-subXnZ' Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:20 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-11 14:32 ` Guan Junxiong
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] nvme: claim block devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04 5:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-04 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-10-04 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05 1:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-05 6:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-05 14:05 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-05 14:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-05 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] nvme: display 'NMIC' namespace attribute Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 16:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] nvme: Export subsystems to /sys/class/nvme-subsys Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 16:53 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 17:15 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 13:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: ignore retries for multipath devices Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 10:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 11:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 14:35 ` [PATCH] nvme: reset retires after path failover Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 14:43 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-02 15:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-02 14:45 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-02 14:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-02 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004071312.GA21143@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).