From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] nvme-core: Make nvme_init/uninit_ctrl setup/teardown symmetric
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:17:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018201713.GA1971@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4627b34e-449a-cd93-ac70-a628d558cac3@grimberg.me>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017@06:29:40PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> > > From: Roy Shterman <roys at lightbitslabs.com>
> > >
> > > Its strange to have some of the cleanup for nvme_init_ctrl in
> > > nvme_free_ctrl. This cause us to have some magic ctrl refcount
> > > handling in controller initialization error paths.
> > >
> > > Make the init/uninit symmetric so we can have a sane and
> > > maintainable error sequences.
> >
> > It's not magic. It's just preventing name reuse when some management
> > code retains an open handle after the device was removed.
>
> management code as in nvme-cli?
>
> > Otherwise
> > you're going to get naming clashes when you bring up a new device with
> > the same name from reusing the still in-use instance.
>
> Can userspace keep an open-handle after device_destroy() was invoked?
>
> Can you explain how would I see naming clashes? I'm not sure I
> understand what you are referring to.
Hm, I'm not hitting duplicate name issues anymore. I can't be bothered
to bisect when that started working, but I think the dev_t lifetime
fixes has something to do with it.
Anyway, simpler is certainly preferred. This is looking okay so far,
and I'll try a few more things to see if I can break it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 11:07 [PATCH 0/5] Small rework of nvme_init/uninit_ctrl Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme-core: Make nvme_init/uninit_ctrl setup/teardown symmetric Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 15:08 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-18 15:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 16:21 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-18 20:17 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-10-19 15:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-19 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-19 15:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-22 11:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-23 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-18 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-rdma: rework create_ctrl error flow Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-23 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-23 15:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-rdma: remove redundant check if the ctrl is in the ctrl when freeing it Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 11:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-loop: rework create_ctrl error flow Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-18 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-loop: remove redundant check if the ctrl is in the ctrl when freeing it Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018201713.GA1971@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).