From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: freeze IO accesses around format
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:21:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101162147.GA26245@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171101155603.GC25317@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017@08:56:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > If the controller does not support the command effects log page, the
> > driver will define the effects for known opcodes. The nvme format is
> > the only such command in this patch with known effects.
>
> Sanitize is another one. Also Format might either affect a single
> namespace or the whole controller depending on what it advertises in
> FNA.
Okay, we can freeze single nvme namespace's request queues if desired.
It's only a little more code to do that.
> static u32 nvme_get_admin_effects((struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u8 opcode)
> {
> if (ctrl->effects)
> return le32_to_cpu(ctrl->effects->acs[opcode]);
>
> switch (opcode) {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> That is: a) return the value instead of pass by reference, and
> b) if the controller supports the log page rely on it.
Agreed, that's better.
> Also don't we need to also handle this for I/O commands? While
> non of the currently defined I/O commands would need anything, the
> spec defines the mechanism? and it might be useful for vendor
> specific commands
That gets tricky. What if the IO command effects says it needs to run
exclusively? We don't have a way to quiesce IO queues and then issue our
exclusive IO through the frozen queue. We'd deadlock trying to allocate
a request from it.
If it's okay, I'd like to handle the IO command effects separately for
future work.
> > +static void nvme_passthru_start(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 effects)
> > +{
> > + if (effects & (NVME_CMD_FX_LBCC | NVME_CMD_FX_CSE_MASK)) {
> > + nvme_start_freeze(ctrl);
> > + nvme_wait_freeze(ctrl);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> I'd move the nvme_get_admin_effects call into this, and return the
> value from this function to keep the caller a little more uncluttered.
Sounds good.
> > +static int nvme_get_log(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u8 log_page, void *log, size_t size)
>
> To loong line again. Also I think adding this helper should probably
> be a preparation patch.
Will do.
> > +static void nvme_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl =
> > + container_of(work, struct nvme_ctrl, scan_work);
> > +
> > + nvme_scan(ctrl);
> > +}
>
> Why do we do the scan inline here, but not in any other place?
Huh, not sure. I wanted the driver to react to the command's effects
before returning from the ioctl. I don't know why I thought that was
important, though. Will queue it as normal.
> > enum {
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_CSUPP = 1 << 0,
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_LBCC = 1 << 1,
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_NCC = 1 << 2,
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_NIC = 1 << 3,
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_CCC = 1 << 4,
> > + NVME_CMD_FX_CSE_MASK = 3 << 16,
>
> s/NVME_CMD_FX/NVME_CMD_EFFECTS/g ?
Just trying to shorten the name with an abbreviation. Will spell it out
in the next patch.
Thanks for the feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 16:35 [PATCH] nvme: freeze IO accesses around format Jens Axboe
2017-10-27 16:44 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-27 23:07 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-30 14:29 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-01 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 16:21 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-11-01 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-28 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-30 14:30 ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-01 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 15:49 ` Keith Busch
2017-11-01 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171101162147.GA26245@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox