Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: freeze IO accesses around format
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:21:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101162147.GA26245@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171101155603.GC25317@infradead.org>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017@08:56:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >     If the controller does not support the command effects log page, the
> >     driver will define the effects for known opcodes. The nvme format is
> >     the only such command in this patch with known effects.
> 
> Sanitize is another one.  Also Format might either affect a single
> namespace or the whole controller depending on what it advertises in
> FNA.

Okay, we can freeze single nvme namespace's request queues if desired.
It's only a little more code to do that.
 
> static u32 nvme_get_admin_effects((struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u8 opcode)
> {
> 	if (ctrl->effects)
> 		return le32_to_cpu(ctrl->effects->acs[opcode]);
> 
> 	switch (opcode) {
> 		...
> 	}
> }
> 
> That is: a) return the value instead of pass by reference, and
> b) if the controller supports the log page rely on it.

Agreed, that's better.
 
> Also don't we need to also handle this for I/O commands?  While
> non of the currently defined I/O commands would need anything, the
> spec defines the mechanism? and it might be useful for vendor
> specific commands

That gets tricky. What if the IO command effects says it needs to run
exclusively? We don't have a way to quiesce IO queues and then issue our
exclusive IO through the frozen queue. We'd deadlock trying to allocate
a request from it.

If it's okay, I'd like to handle the IO command effects separately for
future work.

> > +static void nvme_passthru_start(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 effects)
> > +{
> > +	if (effects & (NVME_CMD_FX_LBCC | NVME_CMD_FX_CSE_MASK)) {
> > +		nvme_start_freeze(ctrl);
> > +		nvme_wait_freeze(ctrl);
> > +	}
> > +}
> 
> I'd move the nvme_get_admin_effects call into this, and return the
> value from this function to keep the caller a little more uncluttered.

Sounds good.
 
> > +static int nvme_get_log(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u8 log_page, void *log, size_t size)
> 
> To loong line again.  Also I think adding this helper should probably
> be a preparation patch.

Will do.
 
> > +static void nvme_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl =
> > +		container_of(work, struct nvme_ctrl, scan_work);
> > +
> > +	nvme_scan(ctrl);
> > +}
> 
> Why do we do the scan inline here, but not in any other place?

Huh, not sure. I wanted the driver to react to the command's effects
before returning from the ioctl. I don't know why I thought that was
important, though. Will queue it as normal.

> >  enum {
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_CSUPP	= 1 << 0,
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_LBCC	= 1 << 1,
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_NCC		= 1 << 2,
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_NIC		= 1 << 3,
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_CCC		= 1 << 4,
> > +	NVME_CMD_FX_CSE_MASK	= 3 << 16,
> 
> s/NVME_CMD_FX/NVME_CMD_EFFECTS/g ?

Just trying to shorten the name with an abbreviation. Will spell it out
in the next patch.

Thanks for the feedback.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-27 16:35 [PATCH] nvme: freeze IO accesses around format Jens Axboe
2017-10-27 16:44 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-27 23:07 ` Keith Busch
2017-10-30 14:29   ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-01 15:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 16:21     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-11-01 16:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-28  6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-30 14:30   ` Jens Axboe
2017-11-01 15:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 15:49       ` Keith Busch
2017-11-01 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-11-01 15:45   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101162147.GA26245@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox