From: jgg@ziepe.ca (Jason Gunthorpe)
Subject: [v3,1/9] RDMA/core: Add implicit per-device completion queue pools
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:50:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108095742.25365-2-sagi@grimberg.me>
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017@11:57:34AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Allow a ULP to ask the core to implicitly assign a completion
> queue to a queue-pair based on a least-used search on a per-device
> cq pools. The device CQ pools grow in a lazy fashion with every
> QP creation.
>
> In addition, expose an affinity hint for a queue pair creation.
> If passed, the core will attempt to attach a CQ with a completion
> vector that is directed to the cpu core as the affinity hint
> provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
Sagi, Bart,
Did we reach a conclusion on this? Is v3 the series to take, and
should it all go through the RDMA tree? It looks like there are some
missing acks for that??
I think there was also an unapplied comment from bart in the
patchworks notes...
Could you please add some commit messages when you resend it? Not sure
I should be accepting such large commits with empty messages???
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 9:57 [PATCH v3 0/9] Introduce per-device completion queue pools Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] RDMA/core: Add implicit " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-09 10:45 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-11-09 17:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-09 17:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-13 20:28 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-14 16:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-20 12:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-12-11 23:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2018-01-03 17:47 ` [v3,1/9] " Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] IB/isert: use implicit CQ allocation Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 10:27 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-11-14 9:14 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] IB/iser: " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 10:25 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] IB/srpt: " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] svcrdma: Use RDMA core " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] nvme-rdma: use " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] nvmet-rdma: " Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] nvmet: allow assignment of a cpulist for each nvmet port Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] nvmet-rdma: assign cq completion vector based on the port allowed cpus Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-08 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Introduce per-device completion queue pools Chuck Lever
2017-11-09 17:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-10 19:27 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-13 20:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-13 22:15 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-20 12:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 15:54 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-09 16:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-09 17:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-09 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-13 20:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-13 20:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-13 20:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-14 2:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-20 12:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-20 19:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-20 21:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-14 16:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-20 12:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-14 10:06 ` Max Gurtovoy
2017-11-20 12:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-09 18:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-11-13 20:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-11-13 22:11 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).