From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mhocko@kernel.org (Michal Hocko)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:46:55 +0100
Subject: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] few MM topics
In-Reply-To: <20180131234126.oobqdp6ibcayduu3@destitution>
References: <20180124092649.GC21134@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180131192104.GD4841@magnolia>
 <20180131202438.GA21609@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180131234126.oobqdp6ibcayduu3@destitution>
Message-ID: <20180201154655.GN21609@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu 01-02-18 10:41:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018@09:24:38PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > This would both document the context
> > and also limit NOFS allocations to bare minumum.
> 
> Yup, most of XFS already uses implicit GFP_NOFS allocation calls via
> the transaction context process flag manipulation.

Yeah, xfs is in quite a good shape. There are still around 40+ KM_NOFS
users. Are there any major obstacles to remove those? Or is this just
"send patches" thing.

Compare that to
$ git grep GFP_NOFS -- fs/btrfs/ | wc -l
272
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs