Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH]nvme-pci: Fixes EEH failure on ppc
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 09:24:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207012353.GD13470@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <787e4960b62a03b3888c67e73d7e1ee2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, Feb 06, 2018@02:01:05PM -0600, wenxiong wrote:
> On 2018-02-06 10:33, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 03:49:40PM -0600, wenxiong at vmlinux.vnet.ibm.com
> > wrote:
> > > @@ -1189,6 +1183,12 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return
> > > nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> > >  	struct nvme_command cmd;
> > >  	u32 csts = readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS);
> > > 
> > > +	/* If PCI error recovery process is happening, we cannot reset or
> > > +	 * the recovery mechanism will surely fail.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (pci_channel_offline(to_pci_dev(dev->dev)))
> > > +		return BLK_EH_HANDLED;
> > > +
> > 
> > This patch will tell the block layer to complete the request and
> > consider
> > it a success, but it doesn't look like the command actually completed at
> > all. You're going to get data corruption this way, right? Is returning
> > BLK_EH_HANDLED immediately really the right thing to do here?
> 
> Hi Ming,
> 
> Can you help checking if it is ok if returning BLK_EH_HANDLEDED in this
> case?

Hi Wenxiong,

Looks Keith is correct, and this timed out request will be completed by
block layer and NVMe driver if BLK_EH_HANDLED is returned, but this IO
isn't completed actually, so either data loss(write) or read failure is
caused.

Maybe BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER is fine under this situation.

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-05 21:49 [PATCH]nvme-pci: Fixes EEH failure on ppc wenxiong
2018-02-06  9:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-02-06 16:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-02-06 16:55   ` wenxiong
2018-02-06 17:02     ` Keith Busch
2018-02-06 17:08       ` wenxiong
2018-02-06 17:15         ` Keith Busch
2018-02-06 18:00           ` wenxiong
2018-02-06 20:01   ` wenxiong
2018-02-07  1:24     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-02-07 20:19       ` wenxiong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207012353.GD13470@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox